The New Zealand Herald

Wonder about plot? Just enjoy action

- Dominic Corry

With its big heart and palpable sense of empowermen­t, 2017’s mostly World War I era Wonder Woman stood miles ahead of its fellow DC Comics adaptation­s. This welcome 80s-set sequel benefits from the associatio­n, but it’s a very strange film, plot-wise.

The story centres around a magical stone that grants anyone a single wish. The primary villain here, Tony Robbins-esque TV motivation­al speaker/would-be petrol magnate Max Lord ( The Mandaloria­n’s Pedro Pascal), manages to execute a version of the “I wish for infinity wishes” gambit we all theorised about on the playground, and proceeds to wreak havoc around the world.

Semi-immortal Amazonian warrior Diana Prince (Gal Gadot), now working at the Smithsonia­n, teams up with Chris Pine’s sorta-resurrecte­d pilot Steve Trevor (did I mention the wishing stone?) to take down Lord, who aligns himself with Diana’s newly-powerful co-worker Barbara (Kristen Wigg).

Although entertaini­ng throughout, the magic-driven central thread involves such massive leaps of faith it makes the film hard to take seriously. It’s a plot device that seems like it might be more at home in a TV series, or even . . . a comic book. So I probably shouldn’t complain.

Gadot remains a captivatin­g, inspiratio­nal lead, Pascal has fun hamming it up, and Wigg continues to reveal layers. Director co-writer Patty Jenkins stages the action scenes with verve (the opening set-piece is a stunner), and the aesthetics presented are rarely less than dazzling.

As one of the few places in the world where we get to this on the big screen, I’d rather not nitpick, and there’s definitely a welcome joy in seeing a giant blockbuste­r with other people, but the contradict­ions presented by the story never stopped being distractin­g.

 ?? Photo / Warner Bros via AP ?? Gal Gadot in a scene from Wonder Woman 1984.
Photo / Warner Bros via AP Gal Gadot in a scene from Wonder Woman 1984.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand