The New Zealand Herald

Kiwisaver How to spot a dud

Got concerns about your retirement fund? Act quickly to avoid getting stuck in a fund going nowhere fast

- Tamsyn Parker comment

If you are in a dud KiwiSaver fund, you might not know any different. But in 20, 30 or 40 years time it could be the difference between being able to afford to go on holiday, eat out or even just buy a bottle of wine in retirement.

Kirby Rappell, chief executive of SuperRatin­gs – an Australian ratings agency that analyses KiwiSaver funds – says knowing your fund is a dud comes down to three things.

“Are your returns decent? Are your fees decent and do you get service by your fund manager? There is obviously all the pieces underneath it all, but from a consumer perspectiv­e what they are seeing each day, those are the three things typically.” Rappell said to do a comparison people should start with a copy of their fund’s annual statement, usually sent out once a year around May, and then compare both the performanc­e and the fees to the median KiwiSaver fund in a comparativ­e category.

SuperRatin­gs and its rival Morningsta­r both run performanc­e tables comparing conservati­ve, balanced and growth funds.

Morningsta­r releases its data quarterly and SuperRatin­g has an annual report that also compares the net benefit of funds – what people get in the hand after taking into account the performanc­e, fees and tax.

Government-backed website Sorted also has a KiwiSaver fund finder tool, which allows users to check out where their fund ranks on fees, performanc­e and service.

Sorted’s personal finance lead Tom Hartmann says fees need to be reasonable.

“If the fees are not reasonable compared to its peers – it can be considered a dud. Essentiall­y what you are wanting to do is a bit of a cost-benefit analysis, if you see fees are higher than average ask; are they justified, are they reasonable?” But, says Hartmann, it’s not necessaril­y about picking the cheapest fund but being aware that paying more for something does not necessaril­y get you a higher-quality product.

Chris Douglas, a principal with MyFiduciar­y, says the general rule is if you are paying more than 1 per cent of your account balance in fees then it needs to give a really good return.

“And if you are paying more than 1.5 per cent then you have got to make sure you are in a really, really good fund.

“So my view is anything over 1.5 is actually a dud because it is a really expensive fee to be paying and

anything over 1 per cent is actually expensive – that is for a growth fund.

“If it’s a cash or conservati­ve fund – if you are paying anything more than 0.5 per cent then I think you are in a bit of a dud and there is a lot out there.

“There is a lot of conservati­ve funds that are charging 1 per cent or 0.8 or 0.9 per cent and it is just a very high fee to be paying for something that is basically yielding you about 1 per cent at the moment.”

But there are some providers out there that seem worth paying more for.

Rappell notes that Milford Asset Management has higher fees but has also had consistent­ly higher returns, meaning it tops or comes near the top of the tables in Superratin­gs’ net benefit analysis.

“You want to check the earnings and you want to check the fees because it is really both that is going [to determine] what you get to eat at the end of your journey in KiwiSaver.” Sorted’s Hartmann says it doesn’t advocate for the idea of picking funds based on their investment performanc­e as past performanc­e is not guarantee of future performanc­e.

“It swings so it is not a good way to pick at all but we can say if a fund has consistent­ly underperfo­rmed its peers for a long period of time then it is a dud.

“That is what you want to look out for – it could be a sign of mismanagem­ent or could be a sign of bad luck.”

Investment performanc­e should be compared over the longest time possible at least five years and 10 years is better still.

“The longer the better, but obviously some are newer funds and you won’t have that luxury,” Hartmann says.

Service is also an important factor.

Rappell says some KiwiSaver members found out their provider’s service wasn’t up to scratch the hard way during 2020’s Covid market melt-down when they couldn’t get hold of their provider.

“That was a real challenge for some during Covid.”

Rappell says good service means the provider should have online tools to help people decide which fund they should be in and calculator­s to work out how much they need to save for a comfortabl­e retirement.

But they should also have a contact centre to answer people’s questions, give advice and resolve any problems.

Rappell says increasing­ly an app is important, too.

Sorted surveys providers every six months on their services and allocates a percentage rating but it’s more about the quantity of services a provider has than the quality – that’s something you might need to ask around about.

Douglas says if you haven’t heard from your provider in over a year that could be a red flag as well.

Wrong fund for you

Sometimes it’s not about the fund being a dud as such but that it is simply the wrong fund for you.

Hartmann says even if a defensive fund is a star performer it can be dud for you if you have a long time until retirement and don’t need the money to buy a house.

Douglas says many of those in default funds – where people are automatica­lly allocated if they don’t choose a KiwiSaver fund – are sitting on a dud.

“It is highly unlikely that fund will match what your objectives would be for KiwiSaver, which is to maximise the return you can over the timeframe you have to invest.”

Making sure you are in the right fund for your risk profile and investment time horizon is critical, he says.

“I still believe there is a lot of people out there that don’t properly make sure that they are in the correct risk profile. And that is going to have the biggest determinan­t of what their future cash balance is like – how much they have when they reach retirement age.”

Rappell says its modelling has shown if you get 2 per cent a year less a year than you could be getting that will mean you could be up to 30 per cent worse off when you retire.

“The biggest payoff is checking your KiwiSaver provider now, and making sure they are competitiv­e and diarising that every two or three years you are going to check again to make sure it is keeping pace with the market.

“The real challenge is you don’t get a sugar hit right now but when it comes to retirement that extra $50 or $100 a week over the pension makes a huge difference to people.”

Hartmann says an average earner who sits in a conservati­ve fund for the whole of their working life could potentiall­y have $100k less in their hand at retirement than if they had been in a growth fund.

“Now that is a huge difference in terms of they way you live in retirement and how you retire and what your retirement situation is.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand