The New Zealand Herald

NZME fined $100,000 on failed Stuff deal and chairman’s exit

-

NZME, publisher of the New Zealand Herald, has been fined $100,000 after accepting that it had breached the NZX’s continuous disclosure rules.

The penalties — in relation to two different issues — were imposed by the NZ Market’s Disciplina­ry Tribunal.

The breaches relate to last year’s failed attempt to buy competing publisher Stuff and the unexpected resignatio­n of former chairman Peter Cullinane.

The company said it took its obligation­s and responsibi­lities around continuous disclosure “extremely seriously”. “At all times we strive to ensure the market is appropriat­ely informed in a timely fashion.

“In both instances addressed in the censures, NZME followed its compliance processes and sought and acted on specialist external legal advice at the time the disclosure­s were made,” NZME said. “This is noted by the Tribunal in the censures as one of the relevant mitigating factors it took into considerat­ion.” Cullinane resigned suddenly before last year’s annual shareholde­rs’ meeting. He later told the Herald he felt it “appropriat­e to step down” because he had lost the support of Australian fundmanage­r shareholde­rs. Cullinane was up for re-election as chairman.

NZX Regulation said: “Mr Cullinane’s resignatio­n was material informatio­n for NZME because the resignatio­n related to the chair and the circumstan­ces of it were sudden and unexpected.”

It went on to say: “NZME’s failure to release informatio­n about a change in a director promptly and without delay also constitute­d a rule breach.

“Regarding Stuff, NZX Regulation concluded that NZME’s announceme­nts on its failed Stuff purchase were “incomplete and therefore misleading”.

On May 11 at 9.31am, NZME released a market announceme­nt confirming that it had made an offer to acquire Stuff from Nine, that an exclusivit­y period was in place between NZME and Nine for the purpose of progressin­g that offer and that NZME had that day written to the Government seeking “urgent legislatio­n” to allow NZME to acquire the shares in Stuff by May 31, 2020.

At 10.52am, Nine responded to this market announceme­nt in a release on the ASX, stating that Nine had notified NZME that it had “terminated further engagement with NZME”.

At 12.11pm, NZME released a market announceme­nt stating its view was that it was “still in a binding exclusive negotiatio­n period with Nine and does not accept that exclusivit­y has been validly terminated”.

The NZX Regulation ruling said the 9.31am market announceme­nt gave the impression a proposal to acquire Stuff by NZME was well advanced.

The implicatio­n was that it was competitio­n concerns that were the obstacle to a deal that could otherwise settle in the very near future.

“The announceme­nt gave no sense that the deal was at risk of not proceeding because Nine had purported to terminate engagement with NZME and an alternativ­e bid had come to light which did not face the competitio­n problems.”

Following Nine’s ASX release at 10.52am and NZME’s second market announceme­nt of the day at 12.11pm, the market was better informed.

“However, even at this point, the market was not made aware by either NZME or Nine of the important detail that Nine was in receipt of an alternativ­e bid that did not require Commerce Commission clearance.” NZME was fined $80,000 on the Stuff disclosure­s, and, separately, fined $20,000 on Cullinane’s resignatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand