The New Zealand Herald

Disease that may prove fatal to healthcare

- Art Nahill comment Art Nahill is an Auckland physician, clinical educator, and writer.

There has been much written of late about the severe overcrowdi­ng experience­d by Accident and Emergency department­s around the country. This is a chronic and relapsing problem that occasional­ly flares to the point where it makes headlines, but is indicative of a much deeper disease that, unless urgently and creatively addressed, may prove fatal to the New Zealand healthcare system.

As a practicing physician for nearly 30 years who has worked in both the primary and secondary health sectors in the US and New Zealand, I do not use such alarmist language lightly.

The New Zealand healthcare system is badly broken and no longer fit for purpose. It does not work for patients, particular­ly low-income Ma¯ori and Pasifika, who have difficulty accessing timely, high-quality, and equitable care.

It does not work for doctors or nurses who deal with chronic staff shortages and ever-increasing numbers of complex patients, contributi­ng to unpreceden­ted levels of stress and burnout.

And our system, pushed as it is, may collapse at some point under the weight of continued population growth, the increasing prevalence of diabetes, obesity and their attendant problems, or the next global pandemic.

Not unexpected­ly, the most recent flare of emergency department overcrowdi­ng has led to pleas from many quarters for more health funding and the training and hiring of more doctors and nurses. While these measures will undoubtedl­y help for a time, they do not address the root problems of our current system and will therefore soon prove insufficie­nt, as they have before.

What is needed instead is a radical reimaginin­g of both health and healthcare in New Zealand. What is needed instead is a massive commitment to disease prevention rather than to disease treatment; to mitigating the environmen­tal and social vectors of disease such as poverty, insecure housing, poor nutrition, addictions, and childhood trauma.

George Orwell once wrote that being poor “annihilate­s the future”. Psychologi­cal studies suggest the condition of poverty impairs cognitive developmen­t and function, even among adults. Impoverish­ed individual­s have altered perception­s of the future, which may help explain higher rates of non-adherence to healthy lifestyles and medication­s, and non-attendance at doctor’s appointmen­ts.

Faced with cheap, but nutritiona­lly toxic food choices, so ubiquitous in low-decile neighbourh­oods, the alarming rates of obesity and diabetes found there is not coincident­al. And is it not hard to understand why taking time off from work and paying to see a busy GP (who may or may not know you) for 15 minutes may be less desirable than going to an emergency department after work where everything is free.

Pouring more resource into the upper tiers of the healthcare system without addressing the drivers of disease out in the community will ultimately meet with failure. Perhaps it is time to try new solutions — such as mitigating the paralysing effects of poverty through universal basic income which, in several instances where it has been tried, has been associated with better overall health measures. Perhaps it is time to eliminate the business model of primary care and bring it under the umbrella of the public system.

Rather than trying to fill the chronic shortage of health providers in low-decile and rural areas with more GPs, perhaps it is time to train and employ armies of non-physician health workers (like China’s rural “barefoot doctors”) who live in the communitie­s in which they work to provide basic health care and stewardshi­p and bridge the gap between patient, GP and the hospital system.

Perhaps it is time to treat the proliferat­ion of fast food, fizzy drinks and even alcohol as the urgent public health threats they are. Perhaps it is time to establish a co-ordinated Plunket-like system for drop-in mental health services, addictions and family counsellin­g.

Would such radical changes be expensive? I am not a health economist but would venture to guess that these measures could prove significan­tly less costly in the medium-to-long-term than tinkering around the edges of a system on the brink of implosion.

Few countries are better poised to implement the innovative changes needed to create a functional health system. We just need the creativity and collective courage to do so.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand