Part of game: ‘Doc’ dismisses NRL kick-off ban
It wouldn’t be a week in the NRL without debate ensuing following the weekend’s action.
In this case, calls are mounting to address long kick-offs and the intense contact they produce in rugby league — with the NRL stating change cannot be ruled out.
Anzac Day weekend saw its first play of the round marred in controversy as Dragons centre Moses Suli ended up with a concussion following Roosters’ Jared WaereaHargreaves charge towards the defence after the kick-off was received.
Suli was unable to return to the match, becoming the sixth player to be knocked out of a contest this year from a kick-off return, and subsequently there have calls that if the NRL is to prioritise player safety they must ban the long kickoff.
Those calls were prompted by respected doctor Nathan Gibbs, a former professional league player, who said the easiest way to reduce risk was to “ban the play”.
But former All Blacks and Warriors doctor John “Doc” Mayhew, who was part of the process in removing shoulder charges from the NRL, told Newstalk ZB that while he respects Gibbs and what he is trying to say, he sees such collisions as a part of the sport and struggles to see how an effective rule change could be implemented.
“That’s just part of the game, isn’t it? I can’t see [what’s wrong] as long as the league tackles are legal, to me.” Mayhew, who was on the sideline at 131 tests and more than 200 All Black matches, said the controversy around contact in rugby league and union was unfounded if the tackles in question are legal.
“There was all the fuss about that Chiefs loose forward in the weekend hitting that Waratahs first-five . . . and to me rugby and rugby league are contact games and as long as the tackles are legal [I see no problem].
“I’ve watched enough rugby league. It must be awful being a prop taking the ball up for the first tackle because you know you’re going to hit three people at high speed but that’s the game isn’t it?”
Further, Mayhew said he found it difficult to imagine what rule change could occur in the NRL that would maintain the integrity of the game, citing his experience in the removal of shoulder charges that had an evidence-based approach.
“If they’re [tackles] below the shoulder, to me that’s rugby league. When people say you’ve got to take it out of the game, how would you take it out? I know that years ago, I was involved when we got the shoulder charge taken out of the game . . . the injury rate was so high in the tackler and also the person being tackled.
“There was some evidence that there was a change you could make to make the game safer, but running the ball up. What do you do . . . I don’t see how you can avoid it.”
Warriors centre Roger TuivasaSheck concurred with Mayhew, saying he doesn’t feel a need for a change in rules around kick-offs — and that NRL players are aware of the risks posed in the high contact sport.
“It’s all part of the game. All of us players, we know what that’s all about — injuries and that, that’s all part of the game too. I think if you’re going to change something, if that’s what you’re trying to say, then I don’t think you need to.”
The 201-game NRL veteran said big hits are what attract fans and players to rugby league.
“This is why people come to watch, this is why we enjoy the game, because of the risks and rewards in this type of game.
“I enjoy it, I try to fly in there and put myself in front of a prop and I know I’m always going to come [off] second best, but it’s all part of the adrenaline I guess.”
Graham Annesley, NRL head of football elite competition, mirrored the sentiments of Tuivasa-Sheck and Mayhew in that collisions “are a big part of our game” but stopped short of saying that long kick-offs were not immune from reform.
“Never say never about anything, because the game evolves, and the game is a different game now than what it was 20 years ago or 100 years ago,” he said.
“Player safety is a high priority for the [Australian Rugby league] Commission, it’s a high priority for the administration.”