The Northern Advocate

Channel will fund remediatio­n

The company says it will pay for cleanup at Marsden Pt

- Imran Ali

The company that owns Refining NZ has offered reassuranc­e it will cover the cost of cleaning up the Marsden Pt fuel operations. It comes after First Union raised concern remediatio­n costs would fall on taxpayers in a petition to the Petitions’ Committee, which called on the Government to intervene and keep Refining NZ operationa­l.

A Channel Infrastruc­ture spokeswoma­n said the company expected the costs of conversion from refinery to import terminal operations to be between $200 million and $220m, plus $50m for future demolition costs.

“We have recognised provisions on our balance sheet in respect of decommissi­oning and remediatio­n costs, including for the ongoing costs of groundwate­r remediatio­n consistent with our resource consent requiremen­ts.”

Last year, the Northland Regional Council issued a 35-year resource consent to Refining NZ to continue its operations that included setting up an import-terminal facility, which it did and changed its name to Channel Infrastruc­ture.

First Union said Channel Infrastruc­ture was a heavy industrial site that has been subject to significan­t contaminat­ion over Refinery NZ’s many decades of operation.

“We therefore remain concerned that, as it stands, once the resource consent expires, Channel Infrastruc­ture may go bankrupt and the cost of site remediatio­n will fall on the taxpayer,” the union told the select committee. “This represents an ongoing liability for the New Zealand people that needs to be addressed.”

But Channel Infrastruc­ture said it would bear the remedial cost — a fact confirmed by NRC.

“We are often asked about the state of our land and our plans for remediatio­n of the site, and have been very open about how things stand, as we have a very good understand­ing of the condition of our site.

“Importantl­y, unlike other heavy industrial sites, we do not have stockpiles of waste or byproducts that we need to remove now that we have shut down the refinery process plant.”

Through the consent process and decommissi­oning studies, the spokeswoma­n said Channel Infrastruc­ture had undertaken extensive independen­t assessment­s of the effects of past site contaminat­ion and these demonstrat­ed there was minimal impact beyond the site boundary, including the surroundin­g marine area.

She said the site did have groundwate­r contaminat­ion from the refinery.

“While we have shut down the refinery, an important condition of our resource consent is that we will continue to operate the groundwate­r recovery network — at our cost — which is continuous­ly remediatin­g groundwate­r and we will prepare a site remediatio­n plan in the future, if we were to discontinu­e operations on the site. We have a long-term commitment to continued operations at Marsden Point, and while we recently changed what we do, that doesn’t mean we are completely shutting down and vacating the area.

‘Quite the opposite actually — we are actively pursuing new and innovative ways for us to contribute to New Zealand’s future fuel requiremen­ts as these evolve and change in coming years.”

 ?? Photo / Tania Whyte ?? Channel Infrastruc­ture has budgeted for remediatio­n and decommissi­oning costs, contrary to First Union’s claim.
Photo / Tania Whyte Channel Infrastruc­ture has budgeted for remediatio­n and decommissi­oning costs, contrary to First Union’s claim.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand