Jailed blogger suffers for his opinions

‘All this cruel suffering happened to me only because I expressed my opinion.’

JAILED Saudi blogger Raif Badawi has described in his first public remarks from prison how he ‘‘miraculously survived 50 lashes’’ as part of a conviction that sparked an international outcry, the German weekly Der Spiegel has reported.

Badawi was arrested in 2012 for offences including insulting Islam, cyber crime and disobeying his father, which is a crime in Saudi Arabia.

He was sentenced

last year

to 10 years in jail, a fine of 1 million riyals (NZ$352,000) and 1000 lashes.

In

his

remarks,

Badawi

Raif Badawi, jailed blogger recalled how he received the first round of lashes in January while surrounded by a cheering crowd that chanted ‘‘Allahu akbar’’ (God is greatest), Der Spiegel said.

‘‘All this cruel suffering happened to me only because I expressed my opinion,’’ Badawi was quoted as saying in what the magazine said was his first letter since being jailed.

‘‘He’s in a poor condition,’’ the magazine quoted his wife Ensaf Haidar as saying, adding that her husband suffered from high blood pressure and that he was mentally very stressed.

Badawi’s remarks form the preface of a book entitled 1000 Lashes: Why I Say What I Think due to be published on April 1.

Der Spiegel said the German government had warned against publication of the book because it could put the blogger’s life at risk, though Berlin and the publisher denied this.

A German diplomat told Reuters that Badawi was free to publish in Germany whatever he liked, but added: ‘‘The ministry cannot predict the consequences of such a publication for him.’’

Publisher Siv Bublitz from Ullstein Buchverlage said in a statement

in Germany that the company had ‘‘confidential contacts’’ with the German government on the Badawi book project.

‘‘At no time have we felt that the exchange was an attempt by the foreign ministry to prevent our publication or to complicate it,’’ Bublitz said.

In another statement the publisher said Badawi had dictated his remarks to his wife on the phone and the preface therefore should not be called a letter, as described in its earlier statements.