The Post

Apple’s wise DIY telly route

The company has no choice but to stretch further into digital entertainm­ent,

- Shira Ovide writes.

Apple appears to have finally figured out how to become an entertainm­ent programmin­g company – and it didn’t have to buy Netflix or Time Warner to do it.

Apple is making the rounds in Hollywood, seeking to buy highqualit­y original TV series and perhaps movies. The idea is to supplement the Apple Music streaming song service with more digital video. Think of Apple creating shows with similar quality and buzz to Netflix’s series House of Cards but available only to subscriber­s who pay NZ$12.99 a month for Apple Music.

For people who haven’t been following the company closely, this is about the 400th attempt by Apple to become a significan­t entertainm­ent company. It tried for years to negotiate deals with big media companies or cable TV providers to create its own television service with a lineup of live TV channels.

It has never worked because big media companies were slow to shift away from traditiona­l TV business models and because Apple was a difficult business partner. Apple also considered making its own television sets and made some early overtures to acquire its way into the media and entertainm­ent business.

But Apple has finally landed on an ideal strategy to go big in Hollywood. This time, Apple is trying to become HBO, not Netflix and not a cable company. Think about it: HBO is an enviable media business thanks to a handful of buzz-generating shows for which people are willing to pay US$15 a month to add to their cable TV lineup or their internet programmin­g bill.

Apple’s choice of a similar path has the benefit of not requiring the co-operation of wary big media companies. And an HBO-like video offer is ideally suited to the profound shift in media consumptio­n away from traditiona­l TV and toward smartphone­s. It’s also far less expensive than the $60 billion or more it would take to buy Netflix.

HBO’s parent company, Time Warner, says there are about 131 million global subscriber­s to HBO and its sister channel, Cinemax. United States subscriber­s are perhaps half of the total customer count. That’s far more than Apple has drawn so far with Apple Music, which is estimated to have 20 million paying customers in a relatively short 18 months.

It’s easy to imagine Apple – as HBO has done – starting with original TV series and later adding more video programmin­g including live events or sports.

Turning Apple Music into another HBO would not be a hugely expensive investment by Apple’s standards. HBO was on track to spend more than US$2 billion in 2016 for its movies and TV shows, including its lavish exclusive series such as Westworld. Apple’s business generates that much cash in less than two weeks.

Apple Music’s broadening into streaming video has been hidden in plain sight for a while. The company has made concert documentar­ies with musicians including Taylor Swift. Apple is working on its own TV series loosely based on the life of hip-hop music star Dr Dre, and it agreed to pay for a TV-length version of Carpool Karaoke, a music-themed comedy sketch that’s part of a CBS late night talk show. All are taking Apple Music into more video programmin­g.

One trouble for Apple’s entertainm­ent foray is that although HBO is a huge financial success by the standards of the media industry, it is a blip by Apple’s standards. HBO generated nearly US$6b in revenue over the past 12 months, and US$1.9b in operating income.

That was about 3 per cent of Apple’s US$60b in operating profit for latest fiscal year. This is always going to be the problem for Apple. Any new business it enters will inevitably be small, at least at first.

I’ve been skeptical about Apple’s efforts to pitch itself not as a hardware company but as a seller of digital entertainm­ent, apps and software tied together by iPhones, Macs and iPads.

Ultimately, the company has no choice but to stretch further into digital entertainm­ent.

Apple’s massive hardware sales have stopped growing, and it’s not clear they can ever return to the sustained level of growth investors have come to expect.

Maybe the best way to think about Apple’s Hollywood splash is one step in the company’s slow shift into a singles hitter rather a player that only swings for home runs. Apple has been a relatively low volume but high margin consumer hardware company. It’s a minority seller of smartphone­s and computers but generates more profit than anyone else in the industry.

Imagine the Apple of the future starting to take bites of many kinds of digital interactio­ns.

A slice of revenue from an Apple Pay purchase here, a cut of app downloads there, plus tens of millions of paid subscripti­ons to Apple’s own version of HBO. It’s not clear that will add up to a meaningful amount of money for a company of Apple’s size. But the gadget business is tough now, and that makes Apple’s do-it-yourself route into Hollywood look more appealing. – Bloomberg

 ?? REUTERS ?? It’s easy to imagine Apple - as HBO has done - starting with original TV series and later adding more video programmin­g including live events or sports.
REUTERS It’s easy to imagine Apple - as HBO has done - starting with original TV series and later adding more video programmin­g including live events or sports.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand