The Post

Labour’s tax clarity welcome

-

Since her rapid ascension only six weeks ago, Labour leader Jacinda Ardern has promised a ‘‘relentless­ly positive’’ election campaign, but she should not have been surprised to see her opponents go just as relentless­ly negative.

Fresh from Finance Minister and National Party campaign manager Steven Joyce’s discovery of a mythical $11.7 billion ‘‘hole’’ in Labour’s finances that no one else could see, National sought to sow further fear and confusion through repeated attacks on Labour’s vague tax plans. And it was an attack Labour made all too easy.

Before Ardern’s elevation, former leader Andrew Little had proposed that Labour would create a working group to rethink the tax system and the results would be put before voters in 2020 so a mandate could be sought. That was an eminently sensible and reasonable option. Under Ardern, the policy shifted and became less certain, with new taxes possibly introduced after the 2017 election.

A recent announceme­nt from Labour’s finance spokesman, Grant Robertson, has more or less returned the party to Little’s position. In doing so, it has neutralise­d the one area where Labour was vulnerable.

National has been eager to generate uncertaint­y about life under Ardern and supporters even coined a derisive nickname – ‘‘Taxcinda’’. A National Party attack ad released on Wednesday subverted Labour’s ‘‘Let’s do this’’ campaign line into ‘‘Let’s tax this’’ and warned of a capital gains tax, a land tax, a regional fuel tax, income tax, water tax and a so-called ‘‘fart tax’’. Even cows were not safe.

Ardern dismissed this as scaremonge­ring but that was not enough and the polls started to reflect that voters wanted certainty. Labour’s announceme­nt provided it and has levelled the playing field again.

Joyce’s argument that Labour has only postponed two taxes from the list – a capital gains tax and a land tax – and left five in place reeks of sophistry. A reversal of future income tax cuts legislated by National is not the same as an increase in tax and it is intellectu­ally dishonest of National to keep saying so.

Other Labour taxes target climate change and polluted rivers, both of which the Government has been slow to act on, while a tax on tourists is a popular way of funding conservati­on infrastruc­ture. National has already launched a weaker version of it.

The taxes that have been taken off the table until at least 2021 are ones that experts see as useful tools to correct housing unaffordab­ility. But National knows centrist voters respond to dark threats of extra tax on homes, rental properties, boats and baches.

With little more than a week to go until polling day, and with increasing numbers already voting early, clarity and truth-telling have become vital. Voters can also compare two different leadership styles.

Some commentato­rs saw Ardern’s so-called ‘‘U-turn’’ on tax as reminiscen­t of former prime minister John Key, who could switch 180 degrees if the public mood required it. Unlike Joyce and English, who are still doggedly repeating their story about the $11.7b ‘‘hole’’, Ardern has shown she can back down and change her mind.

Labour has neutralise­d the one area where it was vulnerable.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand