Coal use must ‘pretty much be Uproar as sugar dads gone by 2050 to curb sea-level rise’ hook up students
AUSTRALIA: Coal use will have to be ‘‘pretty much’’ gone by midcentury if the planet is to avoid sea-level rise of more than a metre by 2100 as Antarctic ice sheets disintegrate faster than expected, new modelling by an Australian-led team has found.
On business-as-usual projections, sea-level rise by the end of the century could exceed 1.3 metres compared with the 1986-2005 average, or 55 per cent more than predicted in the Fifth Assessment Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, according to research published in the Environmental Research Letters journal.
‘‘We have provided a preview of what is probably going to be said by the IPCC in the [Sixth Assessment Report],’’ due for release in 2021, said Alexander Nauels, lead author of the report, and a researcher at Melbourne University’s Australian-German Climate & Energy Centre.
‘‘There are really high risks attached to these new findings from more Antarctic contributions,’’ he said.
Recent research indicates Antarctica is more prone than previously thought to ice sheet melting, particularly for landbased ice exposed to warming oceans from beneath.
At the high end of the range for unmitigated emissions, mean sealevel rise could approach two metres by the end of the century, inundating low-lying coastal regions worldwide.
Regional variations caused by different ocean circulation patterns, will see some areas, such as the tropics, endure faster rises than in other parts of the globe.
The melting would not halt by 2100, of course, and could lift sea levels by 10-15 metres by 2500, according to research published by United States scientists last year.
‘‘These are very, very scary numbers,’’ Nauels said, adding his work was generating similar findings.
However, by implementing the Paris climate target of limiting warming to 1.5-2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, sealevel increases could be limited to about half a metre – in addition to the roughly 20 centimetre rise in the past century.
That goal would need cumulative carbon emissions to be limited to 850 gigatonnes, compared with about 554 gigatonnes so far – a tally that is rising about 10 gigatonnes a year.
‘‘Coal as we know it today [without carbon capture and storage] will have to be gone pretty much [by 2050],’’ Nauels said. ‘‘There is no future for fossil fuels, and coal in particular.’’
Australia’s trajectory of emissions may become clearer by the end of this year when the Turnbull government is due to release results of its climate policy review.
Earlier this month, the government launched its National Energy Guarantee which projects emissions would only track the nation’s Paris pledge of cutting pollution 26-28 per levels by 2030.
The onus will be to cut emissions in other sectors, such as transport and agriculture, which have few policies in place to curb pollution.
The research paper also incorporated the so-called Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) that the IPCC will use for its AR6 report to cent from 2005 relate sea-level changes to factors such as population and economic growth, and urbanisation.
These pathways, for instance, consider using a price on carbon emissions to nudge behaviour.
‘‘If we have a carbon price of $US100 [per tonne of CO2equivalent at 2005 terms] in 2050, according to the SSP scenarios, we could limit sea-level rise to around 65cm by 2100,’’ said Carl Friedrich Schleussner from Climate Analytics, and another of the report’s authors.
‘‘This is the first time that a study has combined latest sea-level rise modelling with the new scenarios and we can see clear linkages between specific mitigation efforts and sea-level rise impacts.’’ – Fairfax FRANCE: A dating site that matches students with well-off ‘‘sugar daddies’’ provoked uproar in France yesterday after it advertised at Paris universities with a promise of financial reward.
Anne Hidalgo, the mayor of Paris, and the Macron government called on prosecutors to act against RichMeetBeautiful.com for allegedly inciting prostitution with big mobile billboards.
They featured an amorous couple and the message: ‘‘Hey, students! Romance, passion and no student loan, go out with a Sugar Daddy or Sugar Mama.’’
The Norwegian company, the newest in the growing industry of so-called sugar-dating sites, has been attracting publicity and controversy this autumn with similar stunts in Ireland, Belgium and Scandinavia. Brussels prosecutors opened proceedings to shut the site last month. The firm claims it has signed up 150,000 ‘‘sugar babies’’ in Europe, more than 60 per cent of them students.
In Paris, Marlene Schiappa,
"This site is about violence against women. Behind these golden images, young women can fall into prostitution." Helene Bidard, Paris deputy mayor
minister for equality, and Frederique Vidal, the higher education minister, denounced the latest sugar daddy service. ‘‘This site is nothing more than a tool that encourages prostitution and, as a platform that receives money for linking people up, its role is close to pimping,’’ they said.
Feminist groups and MPs were outraged by what they depicted as an incitement to the abuse of women just as Hollywood’s Harvey Weinstein scandal has forced France to face up to its own culture of harassment and assault.
‘‘This site is about violence against women,’’ Helene Bidard, a Paris deputy mayor, said. ‘‘Behind these golden images, young women can fall into prostitution.’’
Thousands of female students in France are said to be earning their keep by selling sex, helped by sugar-dating sites that have resisted legal efforts to shut them down.
Sigurd Vedal, the boss of RichMeetBeautiful, says his company is the victim of cultural misunderstanding and has nothing to do with prostitution.
‘‘The people we link up on our site are looking for relations like those that exist in real life, except that with us, the financial aspect is a big extra criterion.’’
RichMeetBeautiful.com, membership for which costs €70 a month, opens with a photograph of Monte Carlo Casino and images of glamorous couples. ‘‘Babies’’, who include young men as well as women, are attractive and discriminating, it says. Their benefactors are ‘‘successful men and women who know what they want’’. –