The Post

Where does host responsibi­lity end?

It’s a ritual in workplaces up and down the country each Friday night, reports Katarina Williams.

-

Sharing an informal glass of wine with colleagues can be a way for employees to get to know each other without the gnawing of office deadlines and a constant stream of meetings.

But what happens when a low-key workplace function descends into a drunken escapade where the lines of acceptabil­ity are blurred?

Is an employer culpable if a worker over-indulges and does something irresponsi­ble – or even worse – illegal?

Police say alcohol is ‘‘the most common recreation­al drug in New Zealand’’, with more than a third of all offences being committed by people under its influence.

Dundas St Employment Lawyers managing partner Susan Hornsby-Geluk says employers are responsibl­e for what happens in their workplaces.

That duty of care extended to workplace functions where alcohol was being served.

But in the majority of cases, an employee’s conduct was no longer the employer’s responsibi­lity once the function had ended and the worker had left the work environmen­t.

‘‘An exception to this might be if an employer is aware that an employee is intending to drive home drunk or leaves the premises in an unsafe manner.

‘‘Aside from this, employees are responsibl­e for their own actions outside work, regardless of where they consumed the alcohol in the first place,’’ HornsbyGel­uk says.

The Health Promotion Agency says problems with excessive consumptio­n at work are more likely to arise when a lot of free or inexpensiv­e alcohol is on offer, when food is not provided and when employees are drinking quickly.

Workplace culture also plays a part, particular­ly in organisati­ons where getting drunk is acceptable, as well as when drinking occurs during work hours, the agency says.

Hospitalit­y New Zealand Wellington branch president Jeremy Smith says, technicall­y, workplaces are not allowed to provide free alcohol to staff without a liquor licence.

‘‘The law doesn’t make sense and it’s an unintended consequenc­e . . . but a lot of workplaces and offices do inadverten­tly break the law.

‘‘So, what’s their way around it? They get someone with a caterer’s licence to come in, run it as a licensed premises and that organisati­on will take responsibi­lity for providing alcohol.’’

Hornsby-Geluk says there have been cases where workers congregate at a bar off-site. While employers may not have arranged the gathering, if a worker’s conduct brought the company into disrepute, the employee could still face sanctions.

‘‘If the employer’s image and reputation is damaged as a result of the connection to the employee’s actions, disciplina­ry action can occur.’’

Smith says bars and restaurant­s regularly have to turn away people who have over-indulged at boozy office parties. ‘‘Often on a Friday at sort of 7 o’clock, people don’t necessaril­y take kindly to being told they can’t come into one of our businesses with their mates. And it does create unnecessar­y tension.’’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand