The Post

Prefabs ‘key’ to housing woes

- Matthew Tso matthew.tso@stuff.co.nz

For many Kiwis, the word ‘‘prefab’’ conjures up images of cold, ugly school classrooms – it’s a perception that some in the building industry say is holding the country back.

Fast constructi­on times, modern design and the incorporat­ion of energy-efficient features could make prefabrica­ted houses a key piece in the puzzle in closing the shortfall in New Zealand’s housing stocks.

Heather Crilly, a member of the New Zealand Institute of Building Surveyors (NZIBS) executive, said New Zealand had been slow to recognise the value of prefabrica­ted buildings which were constructe­d whole, in sections or as parts off-site.

While only 5 to 10 per cent of newly built homes in New Zealand were prefabs, that number in some parts of Europe was as high as 80 per cent.

Crilly said with an acute housing shortage across much of the country, the obvious advantage of prefabrica­tion techniques was the speed at which homes could be built.

Prefabrica­tion could also provide a better quality product because manufactur­ing was carried out indoors in controlled conditions. Modern insulation and other energy efficient techniques could also be applied.

A greater variety of prefabrica­ted products would become available as the market expanded and economy of scale could eventually lower prices.

There was also scope for New Zealand to import houses from places like Europe where the industry was well establishe­d.

One company that constructs prefabrica­ted houses in New Zealand is Matrix Homes, which has an assembly line in the former General Motors plant in Upper Hutt.

Account manager Marcus Bokkerink said Matrix was building around 10 houses of various sizes a month. Its output was limited only by the floor space of the factory, of which the company was using half, and the number of staff.

While the cost of building a prefab was comparable to an on-site build depending on specificat­ions, savings were made on labour costs.

A standard three-bedroom house took about six weeks to complete where an on-site build might take a year to 18 months.

‘‘You also get to live in your home sooner or [in the case of landlords] get tenants into the house sooner.’’

While Matrix had encountere­d covenants on subdivisio­ns that excluded ‘‘transporta­ble houses’’ he said Kiwis were coming around to the idea of prefabs as a viable option. Matrix was close to completing a project in Tawa where they would be craning 22 homes on to a new developmen­t.

Matrix spokeswoma­n Whitney Murrie said a stigma around prefabs remained from a previous era of buildings such as those commonly used as school classrooms.

‘‘Prefabs have come a long way – to the point that they are as good as or better than a traditiona­l build. [The old school classrooms] weren’t insulated and had rudimentar­y fitouts. There was no thought about longevity.’’

Many modern prefabs were architectu­rally designed and built to be lived in, she said.

‘‘You also get to live in your home sooner.’’

Marcus Bokkerink

 ??  ?? While the cost of materials for a prefabrica­ted house is roughly the same as an onsite build, labour costs are lower because of the faster build time, says Matrix account manager Marcus Bokkerink, pictured.
While the cost of materials for a prefabrica­ted house is roughly the same as an onsite build, labour costs are lower because of the faster build time, says Matrix account manager Marcus Bokkerink, pictured.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand