Judge to review Scott Watson case
Double murderer Scott Watson’s latest attempt to overturn his conviction will be reviewed by the judge who oversaw David Bain’s retrial.
The Ministry of Justice confirmed to Stuff on Tuesday that Justice Sir Graham Panckhurst had been appointed to review Watson’s royal prerogative of mercy application.
Watson is serving a life sentence after he was convicted in 1999 of killing Ben Smart, 21, and Olivia Hope, 17.
The pair went missing from a New Year’s Eve party in the Marlborough Sounds in 1998.
The appointment of Justice Panckhurst to review the evidence and decide what action should or should not be taken was welcomed by Watson’s lawyer, Jonathan Krebs.
‘‘Justice Panckhurst has a fine reputation. Not only as a High Court judge and Court of Appeal judge but also when he was Crown solicitor of Christchurch he had a reputation of fairness,’’ Krebs said.
‘‘We are very comfortable he has been the person appointed.’’
Watson’s legal team filed the application last year, citing fresh evidence challenging the ‘‘two hair theory’’ that helped seal his conviction. Watson has always denied ever meeting the pair, let alone killing them.
The only physical evidence linking the couple to Watson was two blonde hairs – believed to be Hope’s – found on-board his home-built sloop Blade.
The hairs have long been considered the strongest piece of evidence in the Crown’s largely circumstantial case.
Justice Panckhurst will have to weigh up the evidence filed in Watson’s application and decide what advice to give to the Ministry of Justice.
If convinced there may have been a miscarriage of justice, he could recommend the case be referred to the Court of Appeal.
The process provides an avenue for criminal cases to be re-opened where a person may have been wrongly convicted or sentenced.
Last year, Krebs, who helped prove Teina Pora was wrongfully convicted, took over Watson’s case. Since then, Krebs has been contacted by a range of people offering information.
‘‘I had a number of unsolicited communications from a range of people offering material help,’’ he said.
‘‘By that I mean providing information about things they saw and things they did in the days following the night in question.’’