The Post

Ignorance no excuse for ‘leeches’ rant

-

Radio host Heather du PlessisAll­an needs to pause, and take a hard look at herself. Her Pacific Islands ‘‘leeches’’ rant was a major mistake – an error of judgment, and based on falsehoods.

What’s worse is I suspect she doesn’t care. She ‘‘doubled down’’ on her misinforme­d idea that New Zealand is being taken advantage of. She vehemently and incorrectl­y believes the Pacific has nothing to offer.

She has made entertainm­ent out of dehumanisi­ng Pacific Islanders – for that, she should be deeply ashamed.

From her Wellington studio, she arrived at a callous (and strangely colonial sounding) conclusion: ‘‘It’s the Pacific Islands, they don’t matter.’’

I think the 300,000 Pasifika people in New Zealand would disagree. I think the businesses that rely on Pacific trade would beg to differ. The fact that we are living on a collection of Pacific islands may throw a spanner in her Pacific Islands ‘‘don’t matter’’ theory.

It’s also sad she thinks our relationsh­ip with the Pacific is just about money. Human rights, the environmen­t, the fact that we are a nation which benefited from the exploitati­on of our

Pacific neighbours – none of that seems to matter for du Plessis-Allan.

New Zealanders have invaded and exploited Pacific Islands, including Nauru, Niue, the Cook Islands and Samoa. Those nations have been more than generous. It’s an important point which du Plessis-Allan omitted from her argument. The Pacific Islands Forum, which was the focus of her ‘‘leeches’’ claim, is not purely about money.

This country has a long history of scapegoati­ng Pacific Islanders. When the economy took a hit in the 1970s, ‘‘mainstream Kiwis’’ brutishly supported the dawn raids of islanders’ homes. They were helpful, productive members of our society and, suddenly, they were branded as leeches – not people.

The outcry following du PlessisAll­an’s comments isn’t about her lack of political correctnes­s. My concern is her willingnes­s to stoke old, divisive flames. Even more worrying is her willingnes­s, after being presented with the history of our relationsh­ip with the Pacific, to ‘‘double down’’ on her rhetoric.

Instead of using her platform to educate and inform, she has used it to grow resentment.

We should all be concerned when

public figures, like du Plessis-Allan, resort to harmful ideas that have been used to divide us. These ideas can have real effects for marginalis­ed Kiwis.

Ignorance is no excuse for a distinguis­hed journalist. Her language was from the 1970s and it has no place in the 21st century.

She has acted to reinforce racist propaganda that justifies treating people without dignity.

While it seems many populist pundits won’t admit it, New Zealand is a diverse nation. Broadcaste­rs like du PlessisAll­an make a living from pitting ‘‘us’’ against ‘‘them’’.

Their language acts to marginalis­e people unlike them, people who don’t fit their ‘‘normal’’, so as to further diminish minority voices.

The good news is, their time is limited. Pacific and Ma¯ ori business is only growing. Our biggest city, Auckland, is often called the capital of the Pacific – due to its growing Polynesian makeup.

The ‘‘everyday Kiwi’’ (read: white dudes) that Newstalk ZB targets does not exist. New Zealand is a Pacific nation. If pundits continue to pretend they’re living in the 1970s, they will be left behind.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand