The Post

Row over equity ‘back pay’

- Tom Pullar Strecker

BusinessNZ has criticised a ‘‘unilateral’’ move by the Government to allow for back pay in pay equity claims.

Earlier, government ministers contradict­ed each other over the inclusion of a clause in a new pay equity bill that could provide workers with up to six years’ back pay.

Workers in female-dominated profession­s would find it easier to claim fair pay under the Equal Pay Amendment Bill that has been introduced to Parliament on the 125th anniversar­y of women getting the vote, the Government has promised. Courts could back date pay equity claims under the legislatio­n, though officials said that would ‘‘in general’’ only be to the time when a claim was first raised.

BusinessNZ said in a statement that it backed the recommenda­tions of the Joint Pay Equity Working Group convened by both the previous and current government­s.

But the Government had acted unilateral­ly and gone further than the working group had recommende­d by allowing the Employment Relations Authority and courts to award back pay, the business body said.

‘‘Back pay was not agreed to by the working group, whose members had agreed that this should be a matter for negotiatio­n between employers and employees,’’ it said.

It warned back pay could ‘‘raise affordabil­ity and sustainabi­lity issues’’ for some businesses and result in more litigation.

Acting Minister for Women Eugenie Sage said the working group had adequately canvassed the issue of back pay.

But Workplace Relations Minister Iain Lees-Galloway corrected her, saying the Government had deliberate­ly not asked the working group about the issue, acknowledg­ing it was controvers­ial.

‘‘We wanted the working group to focus on the matters that they could come to consensus on. It is then over to the Government to make decisions about the slightly trickier issues.’’

‘‘It is called showing leadership,’’ he later added.

The possibilit­y of back pay gave parties the ‘‘clear incentive to get on with the job and to deal with pay equity claims’’ without dragging them out, LeesGallow­ay said.

He said BusinessNZ knew back pay was a ‘‘live issue’’ and accused the business body of ‘‘playing silly buggers’’. The right to back pay for pay equity claims already existed as a result of a court decision that pay equity claims were covered by the Equal Pay Act, and would be subject to ‘‘far greater limitation­s’’ under the new law.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand