The Post

Abortion: More than simply solving a problem

- Trish McBride

Iam a woman. I am a mother. I am a feminist. Abortion is a tortured and complex topic – and one on which parliament­arians will be voting. My comments exclude pregnancie­s resulting from rape, incest, in girls under 16, and in unusual family circumstan­ces.

As with the End of Life Choice Bill, both the ‘‘always’’ and ‘‘never’’ lobbies need to be heard, then a middle way found to figure a right way forward. Extreme positions serve a valuable function in a democratic society by producing arguments for the pros and the cons, each having some valid points that must somehow be integrated.

I went through a medically hazardous pregnancy, at the end of which both the baby and I could have ended up dead. Doctors made no promises. I had the best possible medical grounds to have an abortion. By my free choice it was not an option for me/us. I was fortunate to have family and community support, and a confidence in the future. However, the fraught experience gave me a compassion­ate understand­ing of how it must be for pregnant women with health and other pressures who, without those resources immediatel­y and obviously available, choose abortion. The baby and I survived, and he is now a man I am proud of.

Physical health issues in pregnancy are rarely potentiall­y fatal. Mental health as a valid reason for abortion surely entails more than the understand­able acute distress and fear about an unexpected, unwanted, inconvenie­nt pregnancy. Maternal mental health units provide good appropriat­e support. But where do valid mental health concerns connect with basic if acute human distress? I shared a hospital cubicle once with a woman who said she would tell the doctors it was abortion or suicide, ‘‘but don’t worry, I don’t mean it’’.

As a thinking as well as feeling woman, before making important decisions, I gather all relevant informatio­n, and look at the consequenc­es of each choice and who else might be affected.

Iwould want to ask myself whether it was the pregnancy, the actual birth or the 18 or so years of parenting that was my key issue. If under most circumstan­ces, the first two, difficult as they may, can be managed with appropriat­e support, then parenting can be delegated by adoption. Adoptions are open these days, and not the cruel affairs of the 1950s and 60s. I would weigh a hard year or two for myself against giving the foetus/baby a chance at a long and fruitful life.

As a feminist, I was outraged at reports from India that girl foetuses were being selectivel­y aborted solely for gender reasons. All those incipient girls, incipient women, denied a chance at life! It was technology-assisted genocide, another chapter in the millennium­sold process of attacking women. Then I had to challenge myself on gender bias. Was I as concerned for the lives of male foetuses? They too deserve a chance at life.

As a woman, I grieved with the friend whose first grandchild was aborted, because it would have interfered with her daughter’s OE. As a counsellor, I met women who had thought having an abortion was fine, and were then shocked by the emotional repercussi­ons they experience­d. I also was astonished the first time.

On November 5, eight women spoke out about the toll this supposedly simple problemsol­ving procedure has taken on their lives. They were unprepared for their post-abortion emotional experience­s. They called for clear informatio­n on this possibilit­y to be included in the preparatio­n for an abortion and the subsequent counsellin­g. Going public with their stories was courageous, and their call should be heeded in the service of fuller informatio­n.

As with the End of Life Choice Bill, I believe legislatio­n founded on fear and feelings is not good legislatio­n. In both circumstan­ces, ahead of radical interventi­ons, there needs to be assisted rigorous analysis of the specific problems faced by individual­s, and co-ordination of specific personal and communal solutions. Also, there should be personal commitment­s by women to, where possible, avoid situations that could cause unwanted pregnancie­s – contracept­ion, rational analysis and the taking of personal responsibi­lity for competentl­y managing one’s own safety.

To reform the abortion legislatio­n, let’s work for a middle way. Ideally this would be where fully informed women would know what specific appropriat­e support is available at each stage of pregnancy should they make a free, rational and responsibl­e choice to continue it. And in the truly extreme cases the woman’s choice would be attended to with both full awareness and appropriat­e compassion.

‘‘I would weigh a hard year or two for myself against giving the foetus/ baby a chance at a long and fruitful life.’’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand