The Post

Scathing review of bus network

- Damian George damian.george@stuff.co.nz

The team responsibl­e for rolling out Wellington’s controvers­ial new bus network was not cut out for the job, a review has found.

The new network was launched across Wellington city in July, and there were a number of problems, including lateness, overcrowdi­ng, driver shortages, and faulty realtime informatio­n boards.

Greater Wellington Regional Council, which is responsibl­e for the new network, commission­ed an independen­t review earlier this year to find out what it could have done better. The report, by LEK Consulting, was released yesterday.

It found the public transport team in charge of the rollout was not equipped for the job, while councillor­s had underestim­ated the impact of the changes.

‘‘The collective capability of the public transport team and dedicated programme team was insufficie­nt for the transforma­tional nature of the changes required,’’ the report said. ‘‘The programme team was proactive in identifyin­g capability gaps, although this was often later than required.’’

The report found the councillor­s who signed off the changes did not have sufficient informatio­n to make the right decisions. The councillor­s ‘‘did not fully appreciate programme risks’’ because the informatio­n they were working with was at an ‘‘aggregate’’ level, rather than a local level, it said.

The council failed to provide realistic expectatio­ns for commuters, despite being aware of the significan­t risks. While new routes, timetables, and fares were delivered on time, other aspects were delayed.

That was because the new network was not phased in, there was a lack of route testing, and the council did not have enough informatio­n from bus operators, the report said. Awarding operator contracts also failed to identify ‘‘major challenges’’. However, some operators were not providing accurate informatio­n to the council, and some factors were outside of its control.

In a statement, the regional council acknowledg­ed the report’s conclusion that its public transport team fell wide of the mark. However, it also noted the report said the council had a robust governance structure in place, and several elements of the new network were delivered on time.

It also said it had relied on bus operators to be ‘‘forthcomin­g, timely, and transparen­t about their true state of readiness’’.

Council chairman Chris Laidlaw said progress was well under way to fix the problems. ‘‘Since July, we have been listening and working closely with community groups and operators to increase services, adjust timetables, ensure the right size bus turns up, and provide better data and informatio­n to the public, and put things right.’’

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand