The Post

Giuliani defends Russian role

-

Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, said Sunday that there is ‘‘nothing wrong’’ with a campaign accepting informatio­n from Russians, defending the Trump team’s efforts to obtain damaging material about Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton during the 2016 race.

‘‘There’s nothing wrong with taking informatio­n from Russians,’’ Giuliani said in an interview on CNN’s State of the Union. ‘‘It depends on where it came from.’’

His comments prompted a rebuke from House Intelligen­ce Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif.

‘‘I said it before and I’ll say it again: It’s not ok to seek Russian help in your campaign,’’ Schiff said in a tweet. ‘‘It’s not ok to use materials they stole from your opponent, or to make it part of your campaign strategy. Sadly, my GOP colleagues do think that’s ok. The American people know better.’’

Giuliani was speaking three days after the release of special counsel Robert Mueller III’s report on Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election. According to the report, Trump sought ways to turn leaks of stolen emails to his advantage during the campaign.

At a rally in July 2016, Trump expressed hope that Russia would find about 30,000 emails that Clinton had said she deleted because they were of a personal nature. After that, ‘‘Trump asked individual­s affiliated with his Campaign to find the deleted Clinton emails,’’ Mueller’s team found. In yesterday’s interview, Giuliani told host Jake Tapper that ‘‘any candidate in the whole world’’ would accept negative informatio­n on an opponent.

Pressed by Tapper on whether that includes informatio­n ‘‘from a hostile foreign source,’’ Giuliani replied, ‘‘Who says it’s even illegal?’’

Campaigns are not allowed to solicit or accept foreign contributi­ons, which is defined as ‘‘anything of value’’ under campaignfi­nance laws and regulation­s. Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump’s personal attorney Federal campaigns can hire foreigners to conduct opposition research, as long as they pay a fair-market fee.

There is no explicit ban on opposition research provided free by foreigners to campaigns.

But in his report, Mueller wrote that ‘‘candidate-related opposition research given to a campaign for the purpose of influencin­g an election could constitute a contributi­on’’ that is prohibited under the ban on foreign contributi­ons.

Despite finding that the opposition research could have been considered an illegal foreign contributi­on, Mueller decided not to pursue criminal campaignfi­nance charges for other reasons. This has led to officials like Giuliani ‘‘offering a green light’’ for campaigns to accept in-kind contributi­ons from foreign government­s, which is ‘‘troubling,’’ said Richard Hasen, election law expert at the University of California, Irvine.

‘‘In terms of good campaign practice, as soon as a campaign hears that a foreign government or a foreign entity wants to give help to the campaign, the appropriat­e thing to do is to go straight to the FBI and to decline that offer,’’ Hasen said.

– Wasington Post

‘‘There’s nothing wrong with taking informatio­n from Russians.’’

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand