Court to probe crimes against Rohingya
International Criminal Court judges yesterday approved a request from prosecutors to open an investigation into crimes committed against Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslim minority.
A prominent rights group said the decision would give fresh hope to victims that those responsible for brutal crimes against the Rohingya would be brought to justice.
‘‘Rohingya victims may finally get their day in court,’’ said ParamPreet Singh, associate international director at Human Rights Watch.
However, the court has no police force of its own and must rely on the co-operation of states to execute arrest warrants.
There was no immediate public reaction from Myanmar’s government, though in previous statements it has rejected the court’s jurisdiction and said it would not co-operate with any proceeding.
The allegations stem from a counterinsurgency campaign that Myanmar’s military began in August 2017 in response to an insurgent attack. More than 700,000 Rohingya fled to neighbouring Bangladesh to escape what has been called an ethnic cleansing campaign involving mass rapes, killings and the torching of homes.
Myanmar is not a member of the global court, but Bangladesh is.
The court said that it had jurisdiction over crimes partially committed there.
In a statement, the court said that a panel of judges who studied Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda’s request to open an investigation concluded that there were grounds to believe widespread acts of violence were committed ‘‘that could qualify as the crimes against humanity of deportation across the Myanmar-Bangladesh border and persecution on grounds of ethnicity and/or religion against the Rohingya population’’.
Bensouda welcomed the decision as ‘‘a significant development, sending a positive signal to the victims of atrocity crimes in Myanmar and elsewhere’’.
Myanmar’s government and military have consistently denied violating human rights and said its operations were justified in response to insurgents.
The judges said the investigation could cover ‘‘any crime, including attacks by Rohingya any future crime’’ committed at least partly in Bangladesh or another court member state and linked to the Rohingya.
The decision came just days after Gambia, on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Co-operation, filed a case at the International Court of
Human Rights Watch
Justice accusing Myanmar of genocide in its treatment of the Rohingya.
Both courts are based in The Hague. The International Criminal Court seeks to convict individuals responsible for crimes, while the International Court of Justice settles disputes between nations.
Bensouda had asked judges in July for permission to investigate.
The court said judges considering the request received the views from or on behalf of hundreds of thousands of alleged victims.
The judges unanimously backed an investigation.
Muslim Rohingya face heavy discrimination in Buddhist-dominated Myanmar, where they are regarded as having illegally immigrated from Bangladesh, even though many families have lived in Myanmar for generations. Most are denied citizenship and basic civil rights.
In September, a two-year United Nations fact-finding mission reported that Myanmar’s counterinsurgency campaign in 2017 included ‘‘genocidal acts,’’ killed thousands and forced some 740,000 people to flee across the border.
According to the mission, it has a confidential list of more than 100 people suspected of involvement in genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, in addition to six generals whom it already named a year ago. The mission’s findings will likely form a key part of evidence when International Criminal Court prosecutors begin their formal investigation.
‘‘As a prosecuting office, we hope that through our work, we can bring justice to the victims,’’ Bensouda, the prosecutor, said.
‘‘Rohingya victims may finally get their day in court.’’
Param-Preet Singh