The view of M¯aori architects

Stuff is to be commended for Ma¯ ori and Pasifika build ‘new norm’ (Jan 16) and for broaching the subject of our architecture. But I would have been interested in more detail around the following.

Firstly, what specific solutions do tangata whenua architects bring to their architectural designs? The article had an image of Maunga¯ rongo in Tauranga (pictured) but what makes it a ‘‘new norm’’? What is John Scott’s and Rewi Thompson’s contribution?

According to Te Ara, architect Wiremu (Bill) Royal, a compatriot of Scott’s, worked on domestic commercial projects and 60 marae. What was his influence?

Perry Royal, his son, continues the practice and it would have given depth to the article to read his overview and observations as he is a link to today.

Secondly, iwi, a significant economic force? Is the setting up of specialist teams within the major architectural practices a response to the economic power of the iwi and the requirements of national and local governments?

The article uses the words ‘‘Ma¯ ori architect’’. How do tangata whenua architects define themselves? How do they negotiate this professional environment, or is it in reality a lot less complicated?

Architecture is about our environment and, as an architectural historian, I relish debate and celebrations when it excels. I look forward to contemporary buildings becoming our heritage of the future.

Anna Crighton, Christchurch [abridged]