The Post

Managed-isolation plan a case of pilot error

‘One of the most pointless and badly designed pilots run by any government in the world’

- Janine Starks Janine Starks is the author of moneytips.nz and can be contacted at moneytips.nz@gmail.com. She is a financial commentato­r with expertise in banking, personal finance and funds management.

It’s time to talk about the Christmas turkey in the MIQ room. We are about to run a pilot scheme and allow 150 business travellers and a few on the Government gravy train to exit New Zealand and isolate at home for 14 days on their return.

The lucky escapees are not silly enough to criticise this pilot, question its point or argue the rules. A turkey does not vote for Christmas and every business that succeeded in securing a place just wants to leg it and get the job done overseas.

There are no complaints about the $1000 it costs to not stay in an MIQ room. Most of them would have agreed to another zero on the end of that number to fund this faux-pilot, out of desperatio­n to get back to running their businesses properly.

It is perhaps one of the most pointless and badly designed pilots run by any government in the world. Should we cancel it? Probably.

Or maybe we should simply tell the truth. This is not a pilot. It’s a special exemption. These people need to leave New Zealand urgently and because they’re trustworth­y and under the control of their employers, they’re low-risk and being granted special conditions.

The scheme is not just a relic because New Zealand’s border versus community risk has tilted in recent weeks. It was a relic from the day it was announced. It’s an exercise in appearing to test something, when none of it translates into real-life scenarios or behaviours.

Calling this a ‘‘pilot’’ and a step in ‘‘reconnecti­ng New Zealanders with the world’’ is disingenuo­us. It is claimed it will test operationa­l readiness and identify how to scale up the approach. Will it?

So 150 people over six weeks (October 30 to December 8) will arrive at the border. They’re all double-jabbed, they all live within 50 kilometres of the airport, they all have a separate place to isolate away from their family with no shared ventilatio­n, they all have cellphone coverage and they’ve all got contactles­s deliveries of food, water and medication ready for their return. They will also undergo the same Covid-19 tests as someone in an MIQ facility – day 0, 3, 6 and 12 presumably.

And this is a pilot scheme for what? It proves if you can find somewhere to live near an internatio­nal airport, we can recreate MIQ and get couriers to pick up self-administer­ed PCR tests? It’s one of those no-kidding-sherlock moments.

There are so many real-life selfisolat­ion schemes already up and running around the world. Schemes which cope with kids, students, those without their own home, those who live rurally and those with no one to help get food or medication.

There’s no easy answer to these anomalies. It’s based largely on trust and exemptions. We can learn far more from their mistakes and successes than returning our 150 turkeys home in sealed foil bags.

What we really want the Government to tell us is this:

1. We are running a tender for prices of PCR tests for travellers to pay and coming up with a one price package solution.

2. We are booking lab space to take thousands of daily travel tests.

3. We are setting up production of boxes of test kits and instructio­ns that can be ordered online and mailed to a traveller’s address.

4. We are ensuring locator forms submitted by travellers have proof of purchase of test kits.

5. We are setting up online registrati­on of travel test kits before they’re sent to a lab and creating online results.

6. We are writing instructio­n booklets and getting a website ready on how to self-administer a PCR test, and filming online demonstrat­ions.

7. We are tendering for courier pick-ups of travel tests or allowing friends and family to drop off travellers’ tests at post offices or drop boxes in each city.

8. We are setting up the software for a call centre and monitoring systems that will be rolled out to check travellers are isolating, with methods to report non-compliance and fines.

9. We are deciding how many tests travellers will take (the current number of four is high).

10. We are deciding if travel tests will be run on a trust basis or if the software will link locator forms, test-kit purchase and test results.

11. We are designing rules around whether a whole household has to isolate when a traveller returns, and laws to protect the employment rights and schooling of others in the family.

12. We are deciding on any additional testing for those who need to take domestic flights or public transport to get home.

How does this actually apply to Mum, Dad and two kids returning from the UK to Blenheim or your son and his girlfriend coming from Germany with nowhere else to live except your place?

Time is ticking. It’s fast heading towards the end of October when the window opens for our business travellers. Will we see them piloting the use of these systems, instructio­n websites, mail-order test kits and couriers which we’re all going to need to use when our time comes?

If not, what are we testing? And how does this actually apply to Mum, Dad and two kids returning from the UK to Blenheim or your son and his girlfriend coming from Germany with nowhere else to live except your place?

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand