The Press

‘Party weapons’ for children defended

- Vicki Anderson

Christchur­ch discount chain store Just Incredible has defended selling toy ‘‘nun chucks’’ marketed as ‘‘party weapons’’ for five-yearold children.

Just Incredible owner Dave Ellis, of Christchur­ch, said he had no concerns about selling the $2.99 nun chucks which consist of two pieces of plastic linked by a short metal chain.

‘‘I think the bag it comes in is more dangerous in terms of possible suffocatio­n,’’ he said. ‘‘The nun chucks are plastic and kids can wave them around and maybe they could hit an eye but to us the nun chucks are part of our dress-up range; they’re not really toys. Unless the kid was doing karate, they wouldn’t know how to use them properly. I wouldn’t think they’d be able to strangle anyone.’’

Ellis added that selling nun chucks to children was ‘‘no different’’ to selling a cap gun, a sword or a pirate cutlass.

‘‘We’ve had complaints from people about toys we’re selling, like guns, that promote violence but then we also get complaints that our Halloween goods are the work of the devil,’’ Ellis said. ‘‘This week we’ve had complaints about the giant tiger heads in our stores after the death of a zoo keeper at Hamilton Zoo.’’

Ellis said Just Incredible abided by the law and checked products for any small parts which could be a potential choking hazard.

There are no mandatory restrictio­ns on toys other than in respect of small parts and lead content, a spokespers­on for the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) said.

‘‘However, the Consumer Guarantees Act requires that all products are safe as one of the guarantees. The issue of safety of this product would appear to be related to the descriptio­n of it as a ‘party weapon’ and the age labelling of it as being suitable for children over five.’’

The current laws allow the sale of such products as toy guns, machetes, knives and assorted battle equipment – ‘‘both earthly and alien’’ – the MBIE spokespers­on said.

‘‘There are also many toy products which are distastefu­l for other reasons but which are not prohibited. Unless there is a potential safety risk associated with them, or a descriptio­n which misleads the consumer as to the properties of the product, there is no basis for restrictin­g the supply of such products under the provisions of the Fair Trading Act 1986.’’

Ellis said he would take another look at the nun chucks.

‘‘If there are any doubts at all as to their safety, we’ll just yank them off the shelves,’’ he said.

 ??  ?? Despite not really having safety concerns, a Canterbury shopkeeper said he would take another look at the suitabilit­y of nun chucks for youngsters.
Despite not really having safety concerns, a Canterbury shopkeeper said he would take another look at the suitabilit­y of nun chucks for youngsters.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand