The Press

WINCHESTER

- Reviewed by Graeme Tuckett

(M, 99 mins) Directed by Peter and Michael Spierig

Winchester is based – very loosely – on a few weeks in the life of Sarah Winchester, as played by Helen Mirren. Winchester inherited an absolute shedload of money and shares in the family firearms company when her husband died aged only 43.

The Winchester fortune was built on the famous repeating rifle, as seen in every Western ever made. And that was a source of much angst to the widowed Sarah. Some writers claim Sarah believed she was haunted and cursed by the spirits of everyone the family’s gun had killed.

In this telling, Sarah’s decision to endlessly build and rebuild her vast wooden mansion in San Jose, California is a symptom of her ghost-induced madness.

It’s a good yarn, and in the hands of a smart writer and inventive director it could have yielded a terrific, blackly comic film. But sadly all the smart writers and inventive directors were stuck in traffic on the day Winchester was put together. Leaving the Spierig Brothers (Jigsaw) to turn in this turgid and dispiritin­g load of old wallop.

The script is an episodic and disjointed mess that never generates any tension or dread, so the only scares are of the very fleeting something-jumps-out-

of-the-shadows kind. We’ve seen it all done before, better and far more inventivel­y. Last year’s Annabelle: Creation was no great horror movie, but it had a few moments that make even the best of Winchester look about as menacing as an episode of Scooby Doo.

The house, which should be a star of the show and practicall­y a character in its own right, is reduced to a handful of stock shots – all obviously filmed on the same sunny day, while the interiors never look like anything other than a series of flimsy sets on a soundstage, miles away from the action. There is simply no connection between the exterior and the interior – which will serve well enough as a descriptio­n of the entire film. Although Winchester has a few attractive surfaces, it never once engages the heart or the brain.

Mirren and Jason Clarke – as a doctor tasked with assessing Sarah’s sanity – are fine, of course. But neither of them ever convince us they are genuinely scared of whatever is about to happen.

I couldn’t shake the feeling there must be a hell of a lot of out-takes of the pair of them collapsing into helpless giggles at the nonsense they’re being paid to spout. The Exorcist this ain’t.

 ??  ?? Even the combined talents of Jason Clarke and Helen Mirren can’t save the disjointed mess that is Winchester.
Even the combined talents of Jason Clarke and Helen Mirren can’t save the disjointed mess that is Winchester.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand