The Press

Is eating meat bad for the world?

-

Could New Zealand’s love affair with red meat be consigned to the history books? Farmers might hope not but there is growing interest in transition­ing away from diets heavy in red and processed meat.

A review published last month in Science highlighte­d the health and environmen­tal concerns of meat consumptio­n in a world whose population was growing and with many middleinco­me countries increasing their meat intake.

Government­s and health organisati­ons could play an important role in spurring a change of direction to more plant-based diets, the review’s authors argued.

The health burden of high red and processed meat consumptio­n – particular­ly colorectal cancer – could be offset by such a dietary change, which could cut global mortality rates by 6-10 per cent, the authors wrote.

University of Otago senior research fellow Dr Cristina Cleghorn said it was possible for people to meet their nutritiona­l needs without consuming meat and ‘‘substantia­l reductions in meat intake would have a net positive impact on health’’.

Beef + Lamb New Zealand head of nutrition Fiona Grieg countered by saying ‘‘the body of evidence supports a moderate amount of lean red meat within a healthy diet’’.

She noted that recommende­d diets had lower environmen­tal impacts than a typical, overconsum­ption diet. In New Zealand, the Ministry of Health’s guidelines include 500 grams of cooked red meat a week.

Environmen­tal impacts, particular­ly agricultur­al greenhouse gas emissions, also featured in the Science review.

Massey University professor Robert McLachlan said it was ‘‘striking that the main issues worldwide – nitrogen and phosphorus runoff, water use, water quality, and greenhouse gas emissions – are the same as those we are grappling with in New Zealand’’.

However, he emphasised change was possible.

‘‘In New Zealand, the consumptio­n of red meat has fallen by 58 per cent in just 10 years, and is now close to the average for rich nations, and close to recommende­d health limits on a population basis.’’

In 2016, a poll by ANZ Roy Morgan showed one in 10 Kiwis were following a vegetarian diet – a 27 per cent increase in just five years.

The sharpest growth was among 14 to 34-year-olds, North Islanders and men.

Last month, a US social scientist in Christchur­ch to promote his book The End of Animal

Farming said he believes people will cease animal farming by 2100.

Jacy Reese, co-founder of New York’s Sentience Institute, said New Zealand’s dairy farming heritage could help it become a world leader in the ‘‘clean meat’’ industry. Making meat in a lab used far fewer resources than animal farming but required the same distributi­on channels, culinary preparatio­n and packaging, he told Stuff.

‘‘The main arguments – there are many – for the end of animal farming is technologi­cal efficiency,’’ Reese said.

‘‘When you’re producing [clean meat], you don’t have all of that excess. You don’t have things like lagoons of manure that are polluting local ecosystems.’’

Globally, average per capita meat consumptio­n was 41.3kg a year in 2015, according to the UN Food and Agricultur­e Organisati­on. This continued an upward trend since the statistics were first collected in 1964, when it was 24.2kg.

 ??  ?? Eating meat when you could be following a more plant-based diet is creating unnecessar­y problems for health and the environmen­t, researcher­s say.
Eating meat when you could be following a more plant-based diet is creating unnecessar­y problems for health and the environmen­t, researcher­s say.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand