The Press

Hosting Super Rugby finals costs Crusaders

- Richard Knowler

Hosting, and winning, the Super Rugby final hasn’t translated into a memorable financial windfall for the Crusaders.

The Crusaders defended their title by beating the Lions 37-18 at Christchur­ch Stadium, formerly known as AMI Stadium, on August 4 but the satisfacti­on of winning the major prize a ninth time was offset by the disappoint­ing ‘‘break-even’’ result.

While immensely satisfied to win in front of their fans in Christchur­ch, it was the first time the city had hosted a final since 2008, the Crusaders Limited Partnershi­p had to accept that the costs associated with playing finals games at home came with a heavy financial burden.

Under Sanzaar rules the Crusaders were required to pay the Lions an appearance fee of A$125,000, and had to contribute to a third of their flights to and from South Africa as well as accommodat­ion costs.

The Crusaders also had to pay the Hurricanes and Sharks fees totalling $A175,000, along with each team’s travelling costs, for participat­ing in the semifinal and quarterfin­al in Christchur­ch.

Given Christchur­ch Stadium, even with its capacity is extended to 19,600 from 17,300 for the final, is the smallest ground in the country the Crusaders were always going to struggle to post a significan­t surplus. The fact the semi and quarterfin­al games didn’t attract full houses didn’t help, either.

Crusaders chairman Grant Jarrold stated that the cost of hosting three playoff games over consecutiv­e weekends was a drain on the organisati­on’s budget.

‘‘Of course, hosting three playoff games – against the Sharks, Hurricanes, and the Lions – effectivel­y increased both our revenue and costs in 2018,’’ Jarrold said. ‘‘Whilst playoff games are outstandin­g for our fans and players, they can be challengin­g financiall­y especially when full houses are not achieved other than for the final.’’

Only 8500 fans attended the match against the Sharks, on an evening when high winds prevented the big screen from being hoisted by a crane at the ‘‘temporary stadium’’.

The Hurricanes game also failed to sell out, with several thousand seats vacant prior to kick-off.

Jarrold said to reach a breakeven bottom line was disappoint­ing for the organisati­on given the successful season.

The business that drives the Crusaders on the field is in good shape, with strong support from commercial partners and sponsors.

‘‘What is pleasing is that plans for a new multi-use arena in Christchur­ch, announced by Government and (Christchur­ch City) Council, have advanced and provide a level of confidence that our fans who come to games at our temporary stadium will do so knowing that the future looks brighter.

‘‘We look forward to more fans coming to Crusaders games to see our Championsh­ip team aim to make it three in a row in 2019.’’

Last year the Crusaders posted a $328,000 profit, a figure bolstered by the A$125,000 appearance fee received for travelling to Johannesbu­rg to play the Lions in the final. The Crusaders won that match 25-17.

Meanwhile, Scott Ford has replaced Brent Isbister on the Crusaders board. Isbister had been on the board for three years.

Ford, an independen­t director on the Tasman board, has been appointed as the Shareholdi­ng Provincial Union’s representa­tive.

A stalwart of club rugby in both Marlboroug­h and Christchur­ch during his 33-year playing career – representi­ng Shirley, Merivale-Lincoln, Kaikoura and Nelson clubs, and captaining Canterbury Maori for three seasons – Ford moved on to coaching and governance roles.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand