The Press

Axe hangs over Regenerate

- Dominic Harris dominic.harris@stuff.co.nz

City councillor­s have declared war on rebuild agency Regenerate Christchur­ch, threatenin­g to slash its budget by 75 per cent.

The Christchur­ch City Council and Crown jointly fund the organisati­on to the tune of $8 million a year for its planning work in helping rebuild Christchur­ch post-quakes.

However, councillor­s say the city has too many rebuild agencies and may axe more than $3m from its $4m contributi­on.

Regenerate’s plan for the residentia­l red zone is close to completion and advice on the central city and Cathedral Square is finished. It will be wound down by June, 2021.

But while Regenerate axed 13 jobs last month, it also created new ones with a refocus on the commercial sector.

The move surprised city council leaders, who had charged their own agency Christchur­ch NZ with providing economic advice.

Last month Mayor Lianne Dalziel warned she would be meeting minister Megan Woods to ‘‘discuss [Regenerate’s] work programme’’.

She has previously made it clear she wants all the rebuild entities, including Regenerate, O¯ ta¯ karo and Christchur­ch NZ, brought into a single councilcon­trolled urban developmen­t authority.

Last year Regenerate released a long-term vision for the red zone and spent $1m consulting on an $80m plan for revamping Cathedral Square.

There is no funding for the ‘‘aspiration­al’’ square proposal and it has been shelved.

During discussion­s yesterday about council priorities for the next year, councillor Vicki Buck proposed cutting about $3.1m from the council’s yearly contributi­on to Regenerate, a move she suggested would help reduce the planned rates increase.

She said: ‘‘Regenerate Christchur­ch had a clear goal that’s about planning and it was about its capacity to do various regenerate plans.

‘‘All they really need to have, in my view, is the staff to be able to ensure that that can happen, because most of the work actually in making those things happen comes to the Christchur­ch City Council anyway.’’

Buck said the funding cut would signal a change in direction.

‘‘It’s now more about getting on with things.’’

Any funding change would come in from July and would have to be agreed by the Crown as an equal contributo­r.

A spokesman for Megan Woods said after the meeting: ‘‘Council votes were a matter for council.

‘‘We have the money set aside in our budget and have not decided to reduce this.

‘‘We’ll be going into the talks with an open mind. We’re committed to a return to local leadership.’’

Councillor­s will discuss the plan further after they receive a report next month but gave widespread early support.

Cr Jamie Gough said the proposal sent a ‘‘very strong signal’’ that council expects funding to significan­tly reduce. ‘‘To put it bluntly, Christchur­ch is overagenci­ed, and we need to lead a step-change in this space.’’

Yani Johanson said the city’s ‘‘regenerati­on ecosystem’’ was very costly, adding: ‘‘What we need to ensure is that the money is best spent on doing rather than just getting continuous streams of advice, often from multiple agencies that are all publicly funded.’’

And Cr Glenn Livingston­e said the council should look beyond Regenerate and examine more closely whether other agencies are adding measurable value for the money they get.

Plans to increase rates by 4.98 per cent from July for houses of around $500,000 were announced last week, but that figure was cut to 4.92 per cent yesterday after fresh informatio­n on the number of rateable properties in Christchur­ch.

Buck suggested the $3m saving could slash average residentia­l rates rises down to about 4.27 per cent – below the 5.5 per cent figure mooted in long-term planning last year – a move she suggested people ‘‘would appreciate’’.

She told The Press that ‘‘considerab­le savings’’ could be made from reassessin­g developmen­t agencies in the city, saying: ‘‘It’s time to wind back on numbers and funding.’’

In a statement released after the meeting, Regenerate chairwoman Sue Sheldon said the agency would discuss its ‘‘work plan’’ with shareholde­rs next month. ‘‘In the meantime, we remain focused on progressin­g our work to support Christchur­ch’s regenerati­on.’’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand