The Press

‘CGT light’ draws ire

- Tom Pullar-Strecker tom.pullar-strecker@stuff.co.nz

National’s finance spokeswoma­n, Amy Adams, says the party would remain opposed to a capital gains tax even if the Government watered down its impact while still delivering the bulk of its proposed offsets.

However, two members of the Tax Working Group who had opinions opposing a comprehens­ive capital gains (CGT) – BusinessNZ chief executive Kirk Hope and former Inland Revenue deputy commission­er Robin Oliver – acknowledg­ed a ‘‘CGT light’’ could go some way to addressing their concerns.

A well-connected source forecast the Government was likely to propose slashing the maximum 33 per cent rate at which a CGT could apply and introducin­g several concession­s, while still offering income tax cuts worth at least $420 a year to almost taxpayers as well as improved incentives for KiwiSavers.

Central to that idea would be deciding that the overall tax changes could be allowed to be ‘‘tax neutral’’ over a longer period of perhaps 10 years, rather than the five years proposed by the working group.

Adams said she had ‘‘no doubts’’ that the Government was intending to soften what she said had been a ‘‘pretty unpalatabl­e’’ set of proposals from the Tax Working Group.

‘‘They will hope everyone will be so relieved it is not as bad as it might have been ... I don’t think that is going to pull the wool over New Zealanders’ eyes into thinking it is still anything other than a capital gains tax with the costs, complexiti­es and disincenti­ves that come with that.’’

Former PWC global tax leader Chris Wales forecast National could struggle to challenge a CGT that applied at the rate of 15 or 20 per cent National’s finance spokeswoma­n, Amy Adams and that came with more concession­s for KiwiSaver funds, small business owners and owners of lifestyle blocks.

However, Adams said more exemptions to one already proposed for the ‘‘family home’’ would create more distortion­s. ‘‘Every time you create a new exemption you create more complexity and you increase those distortion­s.’’

The fiscal risks involved in allowing a CGT to be tax neutral over 10 years rather than five were also significan­t, given yearly revenue from it would be hard to predict, while the tax breaks proposed in the working group’s final report would be ‘‘largely automatic’’, she said.

‘‘You run the risk you could ‘hardwire-in’ up to $6 billion a year of ‘savings’ and find yourself raising nothing like that.

‘‘I am pretty sure Treasury would be saying the fiscal risk in providing for it to be revenue neutral over 10 years would be significan­t.’’

Finance Minister Grant Robertson and Revenue Minister Stuart Nash last year floated the idea of a threshold under which small business owners might not pay tax on profits they made when they sold their businesses.

An alternativ­e might be to apply a ‘‘CGT light’’ only to small businesses set up after the tax came in, an approach known as ‘‘grandparen­ting’’. That would avoid small business owners having to deal with a complicate­d ‘‘valuation day’’ over which NZ First leader Winston Peters has hinted concerns.

Oliver – who was one of three members of the working who wrote a minority opinion disagreein­g with a full-blown CGT – said his main concern had been whether the benefits were worth the costs. A ‘‘grandparen­ting approach’’ for small businesses could start to address one of his main concerns but it might be hard to determine where such a concession should end, he said.

Neither Oliver nor Hope could immediatel­y recall how the group decided the tax changes should be tax neutral over five years. Robertson said the time period was determined with ‘‘no ministeria­l direction’’, and did not rule out changing it.

Oliver said it was the period over which economic forecasts were normally based. The timeframe was a question of ‘‘fiscal management’’ and prudence, he said.

Hope said the CGT-light concept would ‘‘partially’’ address his concerns. With the mooted concession­s, it could raise roughly $12b over 10 years, rather than the originally proposed $32b, he believed.

But ‘‘while good’’, it would still result in a complex tax change, he warned.

‘‘I don’t think that is going to pull the wool over New Zealanders’ eyes ...’’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand