The Press

Questions remain, but the future is brighter

- Mike Yardley

Glacial as progress has been, the festive season has been draped with a garland of relief that Christchur­ch will finally get the stadium it deserves. All going to plan, physical work on the site should begin within six months, with the multi-use arena opening for business in the spring of 2024.

But even if that timeline stays true, the opening of the city’s premier sports and entertainm­ent venue will come more than 13 years after that fateful February day in 2011, which knocked Christchur­ch off the map as a Rugby World Cup host city and so much more.

Ever since, the Garden City’s stature as a tierone destinatio­n for major sporting and entertainm­ent occasions has been knee-capped. The ensuing reputation­al damage to our city’s lustre has been immense.

As Christchur­chNZ chief executive Joanna Norris pointedly remarked ‘‘other cities leveraged our weakness when we were on our knees’’.

Truth be told, the longevity of our weakness was self-inflicted. Denying Christchur­ch a half-decent venue for 13 long years can be sheeted home to a sustained failure of city leadership, drive and resolve.

The post-quake central city blueprint initially tagged this anchor project with a completion date of 2017. As much as that was probably overambiti­ous, it still underscore­s how much this impasse has been allowed to drift.

During Lianne Dalziel’s first term as mayor, her council relegated the stadium project to the farthest reaches of the Long-Term Plan, kicking it into touch for the best part of a decade.

A belated change of heart saw the council adjust course, shuffling forward its capital funding commitment­s by a couple of years, in the 2018 Long-Term Plan.

Now that the comprehens­ive investment case has been approved by the council and put before Cabinet, the long-awaited project can finally begin in earnest, starting with the detailed design and enabling works next year.

Building the 25,000 seater covered arena will cost $473 million, with $253m of ratepayers money set aside in the Long-Term Plan, alongside the Crown contributi­on of $220m.

There are still many open questions as to secondary revenue sources and private sector funding, whether it be operating an on-site sports museum or offering daily stadium tours, and also the possibilit­y of funding contributi­ons from neighbouri­ng councils.

You may recall during the recent council election campaign, People’s Choice pledged to pursue a regional funding model, whereby ratepayers from Waimakarir­i, Hurunui and Selwyn would be expected to fund 25 per cent of the arena’s capital outlay, leaving Christchur­ch ratepayers to foot 75 per cent of the $253m bill. Despite that election rhetoric, there’s no prospect of that being pursued.

The fact that all taxpayers are chipping in $220m from the Capital Accelerati­on Fund blunts the case for the city’s neighbouri­ng authoritie­s to fork out $63m.

But what about the projected annual $4.2m operationa­l costs? Should greater Christchur­ch share that bill, given residents of Rolleston and Rangiora will reap the social benefits as much as city-dwellers? It will be a world-class entertainm­ent cauldron for all of Canterbury.

Selwyn Mayor Sam Broughton says there’s no need, given the Government’s hefty contributi­on, although he does think the project should have been structured as a regional venture from the outset.

Hurunui Mayor Marie Black tells me she welcomes the regional benefits the arena will bring, but is ‘‘very cautious’’ about saddling her ratepayers with any ongoing operationa­l costs. Waimakarir­i Mayor Dan Gordon concurs.

If our neighbouri­ng councils were levied 25 per cent of the operationa­l costs, it would shave $1 million off the city ratepayers’ annual burden.

Then again, the vast majority of council community facilities do not operate on a revenueneu­tral basis. Vbase currently receives an annual $2.5m operationa­l grant to cover venues like the Town Hall and its vastly underestim­ated costs. When the Metro Sports Centre opens, the council’s annual operationa­l loss on pools will swell to $11m. QEII alone runs at an annual loss of $3m.

Ideally, our exciting new arena should dare to be different and strive to clean its own face. But they are matters for another day.

For now, Christchur­ch’s outlook is all the brighter with the investment case approved. The arena can’t come soon enough.

Ideally, our exciting new arena should dare to be different and strive to clean its own face.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand