The Press

We need CoRE help

- Philip Hulme Professor Philip Hulme is a project leader at the Bio-Protection Research Centre, and a distinguis­hed professor of plant biosecurit­y at Lincoln University.

The New Zealand Centres of Research Excellence (CoREs) are the creme de la creme of our research landscape. Led by our best universiti­es, CoREs bring together the leading scientists across the country to resolve the most pressing technologi­cal, environmen­tal and social problems our nation is likely to face. It might, therefore, be surprising that we have only 10 CoREs.

Among these is the Centre for Earthquake Resilience, which focuses on better building designs to avoid the tragedies Christchur­ch witnessed in 2011. There is also Brain Research New Zealand, which combats age-related brain disorders.

My own Bio-Protection Research Centre delivers pioneering research to reduce the impacts of pests, weeds and plant diseases on our country.

The Government has recently shortliste­d the 10 existing CoREs and five new proposals for possible future funding. This followed a competitiv­e process that can only be described as brutal. Half of the proposals didn’t make the cut, leaving hundreds of scientists with nothing to show for months of hard work.

Yet the process of in-depth internatio­nal review has ensured all the shortliste­d CoREs represent outstandin­g research excellence and significan­t potential to contribute to New Zealand’s future developmen­t.

The shortlist of 15 will now be whittled down to the final 10, which will get funded. This is a tough propositio­n by anyone’s standard.

But should we really have to make a choice between heart or brain research, nanotech or medtech, food security or biosecurit­y? A worry is that this next step could be driven as much by public relations as by objective criteria.

Selecting a mix of existing and new CoREs simply to refresh the research landscape, or to make sure there is a balance between technologi­cal and social sciences, or even to suit the interests of coalition partners and industry heavyweigh­ts, are probably bad ideas.

A more radical and better idea would be to fund all 15 shortliste­d CoREs.

Compared to other developed countries, New Zealand underinves­ts in the kind of blue sky research undertaken by CoREs.

While Budget 2020 has provided a boost in science spend, much of it targets operationa­l research addressing today’s problems.

We still need to invest in the high-risk, high-reward science undertaken by CoREs that looks to solve tomorrow’s challenges.

CoREs are unique in their emphasis on building capability to ensure our students have the skills and competence to thrive in an uncertain post-Covid-19 world.

It seems obvious that investing in CoREs will contribute significan­tly to the science and the skills needed to strengthen our fragile economy and lead the way towards recovery.

Of course, I am biased since I would benefit from a decision to fund all shortliste­d CoREs. But the biggest beneficiar­y will be New Zealand.

As we recover from the Covid19 pandemic, we can’t afford to be unprepared for further shocks, whether from an earthquake, extreme climate change or incursion of a new pest or disease. We need to invest wisely in our future. Let’s invest in the science our recovery needs.

 ??  ?? The Government is going to fund only 10 Centres of Research Excellence. Why not
fund all 15?
The Government is going to fund only 10 Centres of Research Excellence. Why not fund all 15?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand