The Southland Times

River water quality threat ‘critical’

- CHARLIE MITCHELL

Most of New Zealand’s native freshwater species are at risk of extinction as water quality faces ‘‘serious pressures’’, a Government report says.

Threats to native species were one particular­ly concerning aspect amid an overall decline in freshwater quality, determined in a joint report by the Ministry for the Environmen­t and Statistics New Zealand.

The report added to mounting evidence that freshwater quality will get worse unless fundamenta­l changes are made.

The report, titled Our fresh water environmen­t 2017, found nearly three-quarters of native freshwater fish species are threatened by or at risk of extinction, as well as a third of native freshwater invertebra­tes and a third of native freshwater plants.

The report, part of the State of the Environmen­t reporting series, measured water quality, quantity, biodiversi­ty and cultural health. It found problems in all categories.

It found nitrogen levels were worsening at more than half of the measured sites. Nitrogen levels were worst at urban sites but were declining significan­tly in pastoral areas.

The decline in pastoral areas coincided with an increase in intensive agricultur­e. Nitrogen leaching from agricultur­e had increased by 29 per cent since 1990, mainly from livestock urine.

Urban waterways had the worst overall water quality, degraded by stormwater and wastewater. About a quarter of wastewater assets are more than 50 years old.

Water quality overall was a mixed picture but it was clear some trends were going the wrong way.

‘‘Urban water is the most polluted but the trends are worse in pastoral areas,’’ said Secretary for the Environmen­t Vicky Robertson.

‘‘Very high levels of nitrogen can be a problem as they can make water toxic for species and unsafe for drinking.

‘‘We aren’t seeing this playing out yet but as nitrogen levels are trending the wrong way, this is something we need to address.’’

While urban areas had the worst water quality, they covered less than 1 per cent of land but were home to 87 per cent of the population. Pastoral areas covered 40 per cent of land use.

While it was difficult to make an overall assessment due to variation between areas, it was clear there were fairly widespread fresh- water issues. Like other recent freshwater reports, it concluded changes would need to be made if freshwater was to improve.

‘‘New Zealand’s population and agricultur­e-based economy are growing, and it is expected that high-intensity agricultur­e and urbanisati­on will continue to expand to new areas, potentiall­y affecting water quality in more water bodies,’’ the report said.

It found between 65 and 70 per cent of rivers would be deemed swimmable under proposed Government standards.

The risk of getting sick from a river deemed swimmable under those standards, averaged across time, was between 1 and 3.5 per cent.

While much of the water quality debate had been around swimmabili­ty, the report highlighte­d serious issues around the health of native species.

They faced serious threats, largely due to humans. They included degraded habitat through contaminat­ed water, altered flows, and introduced predators.

‘‘Recently there has been a strong focus on how swimmable our waterways are, but that is just part of the story.

‘‘The implicatio­ns for our freshwater species are really critical,’’ Robertson said.

‘‘Many of our species are found nowhere else in the world so it is even more crucial we don’t lose any under our watch.

‘‘We need to consider the resilience of all species in any decisions we make that affect the environmen­t,’’ she said.

The report said 72 per cent of native freshwater fish were threatened by or at risk of extinction, including four whitebait species, lamprey, and longfin eels.

One species, the once-common grayling, is already extinct.

A third of native freshwater invertebra­tes were in the same category; 10 per cent were in the highest threat category, nationally critical.

‘‘A lot of our native species are endemic, so if we lose them they’re gone forever,’’ Robertson said.

The report looked at water quantity and found data gaps and uncertaint­y about how water usage affected waterway health.

Most of the water extracted was used for irrigation, the majority of which (64 per cent) is used in Canterbury. It was not clear how much of that water was actually used. Using Canterbury as a case study, the report found some consented irrigators used less than their allowance, but some used more.

A ‘‘large proportion’’ of consents had no records at all, meaning there was no data to assess.

That data was from 2013 and many more users now have water meters.

Based on consented water takes, the report said irrigation had ‘‘the highest potential to cause widespread reductions in downstream river flows, compared with other water uses’’.

It was particular­ly true in Canterbury and Hawke’s Bay, where many takes were from groundwate­r.

‘‘Our reliance on irrigation, especially in drier regions, to support our economy, has the greatest potential of all uses to cause altered flows downstream,’’ the report said.

Climate change would exacerbate water quantity problems, with lower rainfall expected in already dry parts of the country.

The data for measuring water quality was imperfect, with several noticeable gaps.

Among them were data on long term flow levels, how much water was being used, and informatio­n on the relationsh­ip between land use and water quality.

The report showed phosphorou­s concentrat­ions were decreasing in some waterways, indicating improved erosion and fertiliser management, and over time there had been better addressing of point-source pollution.

There were promising initiative­s underway to find solutions to the problem, which were not highlighte­d in the report, said Our Land and Water science challenge director Ken Taylor.

The overall conclusion, however, was welcome.

‘‘We’ve had a beneficial shift in thinking around water quality which means that no-one is now denying that there’s a problem.

‘‘We no longer have to demonstrat­e there’s a problem, there’s plenty of informatio­n to show that there is, now we need to focus on finding the solutions to the problem.’’

 ?? PHOTO: FAIRFAX NZ ?? Niwa biologist Ben Chisnall tags a longfin eel threatened with extinction.
PHOTO: FAIRFAX NZ Niwa biologist Ben Chisnall tags a longfin eel threatened with extinction.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand