The Southland Times

Lawyer’s case against court dismissed

-

An Invercargi­ll lawyer applied for a judicial review of the decision of a judge in the Invercargi­ll District Court who gave him a final warning and threatened to fine him.

The case centres around the lodging of a case management memorandum, a checklist outlining various pieces of informatio­n relevant to a defendant’s case.

The completed memorandum must be lodged no later than five working days before the date of the defendant’s case review hearing.

A High Court decision outlines the issue, saying that in a matter from November 2014, lawyer Keith Owen was criticised by Judge Kevin Phillips in the Invercargi­ll District Court for not filing a case management memorandum on time. The judge maintained that failing to file the memorandum had resulted in the abandonmen­t of a case review hearing, delaying the timetable to trial unnecessar­ily by two to three weeks.

Judge Phillips threatened to fine Owen and gave him a ‘‘final warning’’. The warning triggered an inquiry by the Legal Services Commission­er, the decision says.

Owen later lodged an applicatio­n with the High Court for a judicial review of the matter, claiming the final warning was illegal, it was disproport­ionate given his generally acceptable standard of performanc­e when it came to case management memorandum, he was not given reasonable notice of the judge’s intention, and in all circumstan­ces the decision to issue a warning was irrational.

However, the decision, issued by Justice Williams, says not enough informatio­n was known about the intentions of the Legal Services Commission­er and the applicatio­n was dismissed, subject to two qualificat­ions - that it did not affect the reinstitut­ion of proceeding­s involving both the Commission­er and the District Court at Invercargi­ll, and that costs should be left to lie where they fall.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand