The Southland Times

The figures aren’t good

-

Could we mentally conjure up some soothing background violin music as we consider the following statement?

‘‘Food advertisem­ents should not undermine food or nutritiona­l policies of Government, the Ministry of Health, food and nutrition guidelines, nor the health and well being of children.’’

Such is the purring of the New and Improved code for advertisin­g for children, agreed by our selfregula­ting advertisin­g industry.

So that’s nice. Especially since as things stand (albeit wobbly) we’re the third fattest of 33 OECD countries, withobesit­y costing our health system about $600 million a year.

And tracking towards having almost one third of our under-18 year-olds classed as obese or overweight by 2025.

Hang on, say the voices of personal responsibi­lity. This is bad but let’s not lazily blame the sellers of legal products for exercising their legitimate commercial freedoms. Especially since the problem is clearly one of poor parenting.

Granted, there is such a thing. But there’s also a massively resourced industry out there making it really hard for parents, particular­ly those on lower incomes.

The very products that nutritiona­l watchdogs would most want us to regard as ‘‘sometimes’’ food are the ones that seem to be advertised ‘‘all the damned time’’ and ‘‘everywhere you turn’’. And they are so often so cheap.

The latest research suggests that some of our kids are encounteri­ng 27 junk food advertisem­ents a day. Critics are reproachfu­lly pointing out that the researcher­s counted product packaging as advertisin­g.

The distinctio­n between seeing a distinctiv­e Coke label on a screen or a sign, and seeing it on the reallife product itself, is likely to be lost on the nearest onlooking kid, summoning up a hankering in any case.

Some examples can be put forward of less-unhealthy alternativ­es being pushed a little harder into the mix, it’s true.

Pressure mounts on our Government to tax sugary products punitively, regulate marketing more closely and - always preferred - improve public education.

But here’s the thing. Advertisin­g of sufficient quantity, skill and slyness can subvert a great deal of educative intent. In Britain it’s been reported that junk food companies are spending 27 times more on advertisin­g than the Government does promoting healthy eating.

We can look at signs of progress, like the star rating system, and take some encouragem­ent. But the national health stats are alarming. We’re losing the sugar wars. Badly.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand