The Southland Times

Please explain, Westpac

-

After a massive failure of service and communicat­ion, Westpac has a great deal of explaining to do and reassuranc­es to first provide and then live up to. In a time of viral uncertaint­ies, when widespread nervousnes­s about long-term financial security mixes with the unease of in-your-face health concerns about tasks as routine as basic shopping transactio­ns, the last thing anyone needed was to be severed from their own existing finances.

But on the afternoon of May 11 down it all went. The bank’s eftpos services, website, app and call centre all collapsed into a state of concussion. People standing at the supermarke­t checkout, or having just tanked up the car, were presented with sniffy ‘‘declined’’ messages carrying the mortifying potential implicatio­n they simply lacked the money.

Others, around their home offices and kitchen tables, were fizzing in frustratio­n as they tried to load sometimes urgent payments.

After several hours, a patchup was in place. Next day, Westpac was able to announce more comprehens­ive restoratio­n.

Unhappily, after rightly acknowledg­ing that it had added to what were already stressful times, Westpac was then puffing into its customers’ faces the halitosis of stale corporate apology ‘‘for the inconvenie­nce’’.

Inconvenie­nce? Merely that for some, but far worse for many others. They were denied necessitie­s rather than wants. They were planning to bring food home for their families. Even if they were among the minority of people who still carry significan­t amounts of cash on them, plenty of shops aren’t accepting filthy lucre in these covidwary times.

And Westpac looks after Work and Income payments to other banks’ customers as well. People on benefits and superannua­tion are often poorly placed to be serene about being unexpected­ly caught short.

All of which would have been maddening enough if people knew what on earth was going on as the hours passed. But there was no capacity for direct text messages to, say, warn them not to make fruitless, sometimes quite long, trips to shops and retail outlets.

Social media was the bank’s only direct channel of communicat­ion still standing. Even then, to the scorn of Snapchat and TikTok devotees, it was only old-school Facebook.

While there were many burning questions they couldn’t answer, at least the personnel in that forum weren’t purring about inconvenie­nce. ‘‘It’s gutting to hear of people unable to get their groceries . . .’’

Adding to the climate of confusion was whether this had been some sort of extension of earlier, planned but not especially well-publicised maintenanc­e work that had been scheduled to make online transactio­ns unavailabl­e in the wee small hours of May 11. It wasn’t, we are assured. The disruption­s later that day were an entirely unanticipa­ted outage of a complicate­d nature.

As it sifts through the more than 4000 comments posted, Westpac will find some pretty good steers about what so many people now want to know.

What steps is a bank that posted a $1 billion cash profit for the 2019 year undertakin­g to improve its service reliabilit­y and backup communicat­ion capacity in general? Why not a system of text notificati­ons? Why not an alternativ­e option to that ‘‘declined’’ eftpos message that at least acknowledg­es a potential processing problem, or properly identifies it as such?

And, if it’s not too much to ask, people want to know what on earth actually happened.

All of which would have been maddening enough if people knew what on earth was going on.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand