Audi’s two flavours of fast
and more resonant in the fastback, while the RS 6’s wagon body loses some of the bullish aggression in the noise, no doubt thanks to the extra space in the back.
Sound differences aside, that resonant, booming V8 is an excellent thing in either car, with a staggeringly muscular and insistent power delivery literally everywhere in its rev range – nailing the throttle at any speed results in an eye-wideningly relentless surge forward.
Audi claims an identical 0 to 100 sprint time of just 3.6 seconds for both. Simply put, the RS 6 and RS 7 are staggeringly fast.
While both leave you with no illusions that they are big, heavy cars that are extraordinarily fast, weirdly the RS 7 does feel more lively and responsive, particularly at lower speeds.
The RS 7’s low-down throttle responses were livelier and more immediate, which is likely down to how both cars were run in, but the RS 7 unexpectedly felt slightly more agile and responsive at lower speeds as well.
Given that – according to Audi – only 10kg separates them, I can’t blame a potential penalty for the RS 6’s wagon body shape for this, but regardless, the RS 7 just felt more responsive at lower speeds.
Get them both on a winding back road, however, and the differences were far less noticeable, with both feeling frankly terrifyingly large on a tight New Zealand rural road.
Brutally fast though. But because fast doesn’t automatically mean fun, both are typically ‘‘fast Audi’’ in their level of driver involvement and sheer driving pleasure, in that they keep you at a clinically cold distance from the road, hammering their sheer speed down with a technically amazing efficiency that is a bit like playing a very good video game.
Still, these are big, comfortable autobahn stormers, so that clinically detached attitude is somewhat more expected and
No, of course not. The wagon is always better, we established that before.
Sure the RS 7 felt more responsive, sounded better and even had a better ride, but the differences were so small that sheer coolness of the RS 6’s body shape effortlessly overrides them. For me, at least.
Most people wouldn’t care about the differences, or possibly even notice, with the decision between the two purely coming down to body style.
And, again for me, the RS 6 still wins every time there.
BMW’s upcoming refreshed M5 is only available in sedan form, while Mercedes-Benz’s E 63 is available in wagon form, we don’t get it here, so it is a sedan-only proposition for us as well.
BMW does offer a five-door fastback in the form of the M850i Gran Coupe alongside the twodoor version, but at $261,900 it is more expensive and less powerful, while the full-fat 460kW M8 is even more excitingly expensive at $326,900.
Likewise, Mercedes-AMG offers its $332,390 GT 4-door Coupe in 470kW/900Nm V8 63 S form, or 320kW/520Nm hybrid-boosted straight-six 53 S form for $240,900.
Powertrain and economy:
Vital statistics:
We like:
We don’t like: