The Southland Times

Accuretic users annoyed at tainted meds muddle

- Katie Ham

Confusion continues as New Zealanders learn months after the rest of the world that a widely used blood pressure medication, Accuretic, has been contaminat­ed with a carcinogen­ic.

Although Pharmac has been aware for a ‘‘few months’’, it didn’t announce that nitrosamin­e – a substance believed to increase the risk of cancer if ingested over a sustained period – had been detected in Accuretic until Thursday.

Accuretic was recalled in March in the United States and the United Kingdom, and in April in Australia and Canada.

Users are now being advised by Pharmac to consult their GPs about an alternativ­e when their next prescripti­on is due.

For Accuretic user Colin Barnett, 77, Pharmac’s suppressio­n of the discovery of the contaminan­t, and the mixed advice he received from health profession­als, is ‘‘beyond comprehens­ion’’. Having read about the contaminat­ion in the news and being due a repeat prescripti­on anyway, Barnett asked pharmacist­s at Unichem in Taupō what alternativ­e medication was available.

‘‘Three of the pharmacist­s came out together and told me that it’s only the Accuretic coming out of Australia that’s contaminat­ed and that I should keep taking it as I am.’’

Pharmac, however, said the contaminat­ion is a global issue.

‘‘I now know that what [the pharmacy] told me just wasn’t true, leaving me wondering how many other people who go to my pharmacy are continuing to take a medication that was recalled around the rest of the world months ago,’’ Barnett said.

The next day Barnett was asked to come back to the pharmacy to discuss alternativ­e medication­s. ‘‘As far as I’m concerned, this confusion has all come from Pharmac. They’re playing games with people’s health.’’

Barnett is ‘‘very disappoint­ed’’ that Pharmac hasn’t contacted Accuretic users directly.

‘‘I had to read about it myself in the news and then approach my local medical centre, but what if I didn’t read the news?’’

An Accuretic user from the Waikanae area, whom Stuff has agreed not to name, has also had conflictin­g messages from health profession­als.

‘‘As recently as June 18, I was notified in writing by [the] local pharmacy that I would only be getting 10-day supplies at a time because of temporary stock allocation issues. Clearly pharmacies hadn’t been notified of the real reason for the shortage.’’

Over the weekend, the Accuretic user was told by the Waikanae Health Centre that since her prescripti­on needed to be changed, she would be charged $35 for an urgent script.

Although Pharmac has claimed those who take Accuretic will be given a ‘‘free initial consultati­on from [their] primary care prescriber’’, the Waikanae Health Centre said ‘‘at this stage this has not been confirmed’’.

When asked why New Zealand was informed of the contaminat­ion months after the rest of the world, Pharmac’s director of operations, Lisa Williams, said it wanted to be able to ‘‘provide assurances to the New Zealand public that there was alternativ­e treatment to switch to, rather than tell them there was a problem but no solution’’.

‘‘This confusion has all come from Pharmac. They’re playing games with people’s health.’’ Colin Barrett Accuretic user

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand