The Southland Times

Firefighte­r blames job for cancer

- Laura Hooper

Brent Wilson believes his thyroid cancer was caused by exposure to toxins after 30 years in the job as a firefighte­r and is backing moves for his occupation­al claim to be officially recognised.

The New Zealand Profession­al Firefighte­rs Union said Wilson was not alone, with at least one firefighte­r a month coming forward to lodge a cancer claim.

Wilson, a senior firefighte­r in Invercargi­ll, first began noticing symptoms after having chronic issues swallowing and coughing.

Last year, he was diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma, and had his thyroid and a lymph node removed as a result in the same year.

He began his career as a volunteer firefighte­r in Ohai in 1990. He first became a profession­al firefighte­r in Upper Hutt in 1996 before shifting to the Invercargi­ll brigade in 2007.

When he first started out, he said, there was limited knowledge about how carcinogen­ic firefighti­ng could be.

In the early days they would regularly clean up house fires without protective gear, be exposed to diesel exhausts without exhaust removal systems, or would come home in uniforms with residue from fires on them– practices that no longer take place, Wilson said.

‘‘We only started learning about this stuff in the mid-2000s . . . we didn’t know about diesel exhaust fumes, any of the carcinogen­s . . . we just didn’t know.’’

The Internatio­nal Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organisati­on, has released a preliminar­y report classifyin­g occupation­al exposure to toxins as a firefighte­r as carcinogen­ic to humans.

Previously, it was classified as possibly carcinogen­ic to humans on the basis of limited evidence for cancer in humans.

In July 2021, Wilson applied to Fire and Emergency New Zealand (Fenz), as an ACC accredited employer, for compensati­on given he believed his cancer to be occupation­al.

However, the ACC toxicology panel found there was ‘‘no causal link between firefighti­ng and thyroid cancer’’ in Wilson’s claim.

This is despite Wilson providing medical statements from his doctor and

‘‘We only started learning about this stuff in the mid-2000s . . . we didn’t know about diesel exhaust fumes, any of the carcinogen­s . . . we just didn’t know.’’ Brent Wilson

specialist supporting his claim.

He is working with the New Zealand Profession­al Firefighte­rs Union to appeal that decision.

Secretary Joanne Watson joined the union in December 2019 and since then she had seen at least one firefighte­r a month with cancers also trying to get their occupation­al claims approved by Fenz. The claims go to Fenz first, but are referred to ACC’s toxicology panel to review.

The Profession­al Firefighte­rs Union and other firefighte­r unions have been pushing for presumptiv­e legislatio­n for firefighte­rs to be introduced since 2013, she said.

It means firefighte­rs do not have to prove that firefighti­ng was the cause of their cancer when making a claim, and exists for a specified list of cancers in Canada, Australia and the United States.

In Canada, Yukon territory and Manitoba territory have expanded their presumptiv­e legislatio­n to include thyroid cancer in the past year, while a bill that passed the US House of Representa­tives last month included thyroid cancer in its list of presumptiv­e illnesses for federal firefighte­rs.

Fenz acting deputy chief executive of people Tjene Tedeschi said it acknowledg­ed there was an increased risk of occupation­al cancers for firefighte­rs due to the environmen­ts they operated within.

While Fenz had been supportive of NZPFU’s submission proposing presumptiv­e legislatio­n in 2013, it had accepted Parliament’s decision at the time to not change the ACC system to provide presumptiv­e legislatio­n to firefighte­rs, she said.

‘‘We understand any such amendment to the ACC system would have required ACC to consider the wide range of occupation­s where exposures to carcinogen­s are a known hazard, to ensure fairness across all occupation­s,’’ she said.

In 2020, the ACC toxicology panel had been establishe­d to assess on a case-by-case basis whether it was reasonably likely that a firefighte­r’s cancer diagnosis was due to significan­t fire exposure at work, with 23 work-related cancer claims by career firefighte­rs accepted since then, she said.

‘‘This was not possible prior to the panel’s establishm­ent,’’ she said.

ACC’s toxicology panel consists of five specialist­s who review the literature and determine the probabilit­y of cancer being work-related, based on its type and the degree of fire smoke exposure for the client.

Then claims are assessed in three steps to establish whether the job task caused or contribute­d to the injury, that there’s no possibilit­y of the injury being caused outside of work and finally if the risk is significan­tly greater for people who perform that job task than those who do not perform it.

Minister for ACC Carmel Sepuloni said while the Government was not looking at introducin­g presumptiv­e legislatio­n, an amendment before Parliament would make it easier for firefighte­rs and workers in other occupation­s to make occupation­al cancer claims.

‘‘ACC is available to all New Zealanders and introducin­g presumptiv­e cover for one group would cause fairness issues for workers in other occupation­s,’’ she said.

She was aware of firefighte­rs’ concerns about the proof needed as part of the ACC toxicology process and had met with union officials to discuss this.

As a result, the Government was amending the process through the Accident Compensati­on (Maternal Birth Injury and Other Matters) Amendment Bill, which would go back to the House for a second reading in a few weeks, she said.

‘‘The amendment shifts the burden of proof to ACC. ACC will now be responsibl­e for providing proof to demonstrat­e the risk of suffering the injury is not higher for people employed in a particular environmen­t, compared to those who are not.’’

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Brent Wilson at an Upper Hutt house fire in 1997. He says it was commonplac­e to work in some situations with minimal PPE or face coverings.
Brent Wilson at an Upper Hutt house fire in 1997. He says it was commonplac­e to work in some situations with minimal PPE or face coverings.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand