The Timaru Herald

Banned Aussie trio not invited

- Jon Pierik

The three Australian players banned for their roles in the balltamper­ing scandal will not be invited to the Cricket Australia awards night, where a point of intrigue will be whether Cameron Bancroft is awarded votes for his performanc­e in the Cape Town clash.

Steve Smith, David Warner and Bancroft will not attend the February 11 event at Crown in Melbourne because they are not contracted by CA.

The year-long bans on Smith and Warner do not end until March 28, while Bancroft has also yet to regain a CA contract. His nine-month ban ended last month and, while he has returned through the Big Bash League, he is not centrally contracted.

Any votes the three men accrued through the voting period – namely the opening three tests in South Africa before they were suspended from the final test – will stand but they are ineligible to claim any awards, including the top honour, the Allan Border Medal.

‘‘The official voting procedures for the Australian Cricket Awards, which, for this voting period were agreed between the ACA and CA in January 2018 detail the eligibilit­y requiremen­ts for each award,’’ a CA spokesman said.

‘‘The eligibilit­y rules for the test, ODI and T20 Internatio­nal Players of the Year provide that where a player receives a suspension for a time period, rather than specific matches, the player is automatica­lly disqualifi­ed from winning the award for any form of the game that the player played during the period of the suspension.

‘‘In the case of Steve, David and Cameron, they will be ineligible to be awarded Test, ODI or T20 Internatio­nal Player of the Year at this year’s Australian Cricket Awards.’’

Smith and Warner have dominated the count in recent years, splitting not only the past four Border medals but also three of the past four test and ODI player awards.

Smith’s immediate concern is dealing with an elbow injury, which forced him home from the Bangladesh Premier League.

It was announced on Saturday that the former captain will have surgery, and will be out of action for six weeks.

Just how CA presents the highlights package and references the now-infamous 322-run loss at Newlands will be a curious subplot of this year’s count, a match which forever will be remembered for Warner

Ball-tracking replays confirmed the ball was pitching outside leg stump, however Rayudu had already wasted India’s only review.

Richardson blasted out Dinesh Karthik and Ravindra Jadeja but Sharma’s six sixes and continued presence at the crease gave India’s fans, well represente­d in the 37,556-strong crowd, some hope. However, a victory equation of 75 runs from the final five overs ultimately proved insurmount­able as Shama went down swinging at Marcus Stoinis.

‘‘We kept losing wickets at the wrong time,’’ Sharma said.

‘‘These are the games that will teach you a lot.’’

Earlier, Stoinis smacked an unbeaten 47 off 43 balls as Australia batted out their full 50 overs for just the third time in nine ODIs under Justin Langer. AAP directing Bancroft to use a piece of yellow sandpaper to scuff a ball that was not reverse swinging.

Smith, as he reiterated recently, was guilty of knowing something was being hatched but instead of stopping it, continued to walk by the pair in the dressing room during the lunch break on day three.

Smith and Warner each failed with the bat in that test, the former making 5 and 7 and the latter 30 and 32, meaning they are unlikely to be awarded votes on the 3-2-1 basis.

However, eyebrows are likely to be raised should Bancroft poll. There is every chance that will be the case for he top scored in the first innings, supplying his team’s only half century (77) in a total of 255, while he was only behind Warner in scoring 26 in a second innings debacle where the visitors were fired out for 107.

Fast bowler Pat Cummins, with seven wickets for the match, is also likely to feature in the votes, while Nathan Lyon, with five wickets and a fighting 47 in the first innings, will also have support.

The Border Medal process features a 3-2-1 vote from the players, while the 3-2-1 of the match referee and a selected journalist are combined in a collective 3-2-1 vote. The votes are cast immediatel­y after a match.

The match referee during the tumultuous third test was Andy Pycroft, who handed Smith a onematch ban and stripped Bancroft of three demerit points for their roles in the tampering. The subsequent major suspension­s came after a CA investigat­ion led by former integrity chief Iain Roy.

Next month’s awards night shapes as a sombre affair, in contrast to last year’s buoyant mood after Smith had been labelled the country’s best batsman since Sir Donald Bradman while helping to reclaim the Ashes.

Lyon, with 49 test wickets at 34.02 last year, and Cummins, with 44 test wickets at 19.97, are favourites to claim the Border medal but strong performanc­es in the two-test series against Sri Lanka, beginning this month, could determine who nudges ahead.

Lyon also has the potential to claim votes in three-match oneday series against India, although test votes carry a greater weighting.

There will be some joy, however, at the count, for the women’s Twenty20 side will be celebrated for claiming last year’s World Cup in the Caribbean.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand