The Timaru Herald

US divide mirrors drift into Civil War

- Gwynne Dyer

World Watch ‘‘President Trump, on behalf of all the MAGA patriots in America, I want to thank you for the historic victory for white life in the Supreme Court,’’ said Congresswo­man Mary Miller at a Trump rally in Illinois after the court struck down the judgment (Roe v Wade) that has protected abortion rights for 49 years.

After her speech, her spokespers­on quickly told the media that the Republican politician didn’t really mean it – it was just a ‘‘mix up of words’’.

You know, the way everybody randomly puts the word ‘‘white’’ into sentences by accident: ‘‘white ex-President Trump’’, ‘‘white Illinois’’, ‘‘white MAGA patriots’’.

What Miller really meant to say, of course, was ‘‘white victory for historic life’’. It is cruel and wicked for people to twist her words like that.

Yet at that rally, coming out of Miller’s mouth, the remark really seemed to echo the hopes and beliefs of the crowd.

It’s a safe bet at least half the people who rejoiced at the abortion ban are also believers in the ‘‘Great Replacemen­t’’. That’s the paranoid theory that immigratio­n is a liberal plot to create a non-white majority that will overwhelm the votes and the interests of the real, true Americans (who are white, rightwing Christians and loyal Republican voters).

This is a constant theme on the pro-Trump media in the United States, but it doesn’t stop at America’s borders. Both the far right and the even farther right candidates for president in the French recent election, Marine Le Pen and Eric Zemmour, pushed the ‘‘Great Replacemen­t’’ nonsense as hard as they could.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban wallows in ‘‘Great Replacemen­t’’ rhetoric, claiming Europe is committing suicide by letting non-white and nonChristi­an immigrants and refugees in. He pushes pro-family policies in Hungary, but rails against gay families as ‘‘illegitima­te, nonprocrea­tive entities’’.

Poland bans abortion for almost all cases, even for foetuses with severe congenital abnormalit­ies, and makes accessing contracept­ion as difficult as possible. It is also considerin­g making divorce harder in order to increase the birth rate.

But it’s in the United States that the anti-abortion movement has made the most progress, mainly because it is so closely allied with religion. And its ambitions do not end with banning abortion.

Justice Clarence Thomas, one of the six judges (out of nine) on the Supreme Court who voted to overrule Roe v Wade, added an ominous comment to his judgment. He said the court should go further and jettison the entire line of ‘‘privacy’’ precedents that protect access to contracept­ion, gay rights and same-sex marriage.

Thomas is the most conservati­ve member of a very conservati­ve court, and several of his colleagues insisted that the Roe v Wade ruling does not threaten other precedents under the privacy heading.

But that’s not correct. As the three dissenting judges said, ‘‘If the majority is right in its legal analysis, all those (privacy) decisions were wrong. And if that is true, it is impossible to understand how the majority can say that its opinion today does not threaten – does not even ‘undermine’ – any number of other constituti­onal rights’’.

Today abortion, tomorrow contracept­ion, gay rights, equal rights in marriage, you name it. Give the Republican­s a majority in both houses of Congress this November, add Trump as comeback president in 2024, and anything is possible. And it would all be imposed by a minority of voters exploiting the huge voting advantages of the ‘‘Red’’ states.

This is a divide on fundamenta­l rights so deep that it resembles the drift into the American Civil War in the 1850s.

Despite the attempted coup of January 2021, nothing so extreme is likely this time. But a decade or more of violence in the streets, political paralysis, and even the rise of a strongman ‘‘state of emergency’’ regime is becoming imaginable.

Everybody can recite a litany of criticisms about the failings of the US, and many of them would be at least partly true. But most of those critics have no idea how frightened they will be if it goes rogue, or (more likely) how much they will miss it if it just withdraws from the world.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand