The Timaru Herald

All power to the nonconform­ists of the world

- Peter Griffin Freelance science and technology writer, founding director of the Science Media Centre and founding editor of Sciblogs.co.nz. @petergnz

Ameme circulates regularly on Twitter where someone asks you to list public figures, living or dead, you’d like to invite to a dinner party. Two names have always been on my list, the sci-fi writer Arthur C Clarke and the British scientist James Lovelock, who died on July 27, aged 103. These two great thinkers shared an independen­ce of spirit and approach to science that has added immeasurab­ly to the sum of human knowledge. Both had a very good grasp on scientific theory but, crucially, were also obsessed with the applicatio­n of science to real world problems. Clarke was the first to see the potential for geostation­ary satellites to form a global telecommun­ications network.

Lovelock, a chemist, was a bona fide inventor to whom we owe a particular debt of gratitude, located where we are on the planet. In the 1950s he developed a device he called the Electron Capture Detector (ECD). It was capable of detecting tiny traces of man-made chemicals in the Earth’s atmosphere. He was able to use it to show that traces of chlorofluo­rocarbons (CFCs), commonly used in the middle of the 20th century as refrigeran­ts, were present in the stratosphe­re. Other scientists used his instrument­s to explore how CFCs were destroying the ozone layer, creating the ‘‘ozone hole’’ over Antarctica that exposed us to elevated doses of ultraviole­t radiation.

The work led to the banning of CFCs and the ozone layer has been gradually recovering ever since. The royalties from that invention gave Lovelock the means to do his own thing and he has been an ‘‘independen­t scientist since 1964’’. He wasn’t beholden to any university department, though he published in the major scientific journals and did a stint working at Nasa looking at the potential for extraterre­strial life on Mars and elsewhere in the universe.

Sadly, scientists forging their own path are too often written off as cranks or eccentrics. The Gaia hypothesis, which Lovelock is most famous for, was initially panned or ignored by the academic establishm­ent. It proposed that living organisms interact with their inorganic surroundin­gs on Earth to form a complex, self-regulating system constantly in search of equilibriu­m. The idea has since had a major influence on how scientists study the world.

‘‘Lovelock showed us that Darwin had it only half right,’’ the geoscienti­st Lee Kump said of the Gaia theory. ‘‘Life evolves in response to environmen­tal change, but the environmen­t also evolves in response to biological change.’’ All power then to the Lovelocks of this world, the non-conformist­s who break new ground and benefit all of humanity in the process.

Lovelock showed us that Darwin had it only half right.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand