Waikato Times

Historic pollution rights rewards intensive farming practices

- RICK BURKE: OPINION

Freshwater and the environmen­t is at the forefront of conversati­ons around New Zealand and will certainly become an election issue.

The public, media, nongovernm­ent organisati­ons and even politician­s fail to understand and focus on what’s really in behind some of New Zealand’s deteriorat­ing water quality.

Regional approaches and policies are failing to manage intensive land uses and in some cases are actually creating management frameworks which protect and provide incentives for intensive farming to the detriment of not only the environmen­t but also other more sustainabl­e farming land uses.

In fact the effect of the government’s national policy on freshwater management is seeing some regional councils allocating pollution rights to farmers.

This approach is called grandparen­ting. This is based around historical use of nitrogen (N) by giving each property an N discharge allowance (referred to as an NDA).

Nutrient budgets by Overseer software are then used to assess the nitrogen each property was deemed to be leaching over a set period of historical years of production.

As a result, the high leachers of nitrogen are allowed to carry on leaching nitrogen in an unsustaina­ble manner.

Nitrogen finds its way into our waterways through the soil profile or overland flow and grandparen­ting effectivel­y protects intensive farming systems.

Drystock farmers, low nitrogen leaching and organic dairy farmers on the other hand have their nitrogen leaching capped at low levels as they historical­ly leach less nitrogen.

This locks them into a situation which gives no flexibilit­y for future farming system developmen­t or change in land use.

The low leachers of nitrogen become the whipping boys by providing clean water to dilute the high leachers’ pollution.

The use of grandparen­ting as a principle to drive regulation has no science base.

It’s a crude expedient mechanism, a synthetic dial up approach to manage nitrogen which is unsustaina­ble and morally wrong.

Grandparen­ting simply rewards the polluters.

The principle of grandparen­ting to drive regulation has been used by the Canterbury Regional Council and has now been notified by the Waikato Regional Council to drive Healthy Rivers Waipa Waikato Plan Change 1.

And we don’t have to look any further than Canterbury to see the evidence over five years with their regional council adopting a grandparen­ting type approach as the starting point to drive regulation.

What once were swimmable rivers have deteriorat­ed and one of the main contributo­rs is N contaminat­ion.

It is so bad, that in some of the rivers and coastal areas of Canterbury there is a nutrient overload causing algal blooms, a significan­t threat to human health.

This is simply because the high N leachers have been able to carry on leaching N.

This, combined with irrigation on leaky soils, has led to this sad situation which is now threatenin­g New Zealand’s clean green reputation.

Now the Waikato Regional Council through Healthy Rivers Plan Change 1 is heading down the same track.

Our government has failed to take the necessary action to ensure that those who are polluting water are faced with the cost of cleaning it up, and essentiall­y through a failure to act or provide leadership is supporting the exploitati­on and degradatio­n of our natural resources.

In Waikato following the notificati­on of plan change 1, there has been an uprising by farmers against PC1 using grandparen­ting to drive regulation.

These farmers are mainly drystock farmers, low N leaching and organic dairy farmers. Groups have been formed across the Waikato to fight PC1, including Farmers For Positive Change (F4PC), Primary Land Users Group (PLUG), King Country River Care (KCRC) and Sustainabl­e Vibrant Communitie­s Awareness Group (SVCAG).

These groups represent in excess of 3000 farmers with numbers growing.

These groups want central government to outlaw grandparen­ting and to incentivis­e policy and regulation for the common good of our communitie­s, our farm systems and the environmen­t.

Rick Burke is the chairman of Farmers for Positive Change

 ?? PHILIP BRANDON ?? Drystock farmers fear the rules of plan change 1 will remove the flexibilit­y within their farm system which is required to farm successful­ly.
PHILIP BRANDON Drystock farmers fear the rules of plan change 1 will remove the flexibilit­y within their farm system which is required to farm successful­ly.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand