Local knowledge rules
Iwonder if Shane Jones, the Minister of Macho Bluster, had a point when he called for a New Zealander to be appointed the next chief executive of Fonterra. After all, our biggest company hasn’t exactly covered itself in glory under the leadership of the Dutchman Theo Spierings, who will quit later this year, or his Canadian predecessor.
And while it may be simplistic to assume that a New Zealander would do the job better, Jones has focused attention on one of our more peculiar national quirks: The assumption important jobs are best given to outsiders.
We kid ourselves we’ve outgrown the old cultural cringe whereby we automatically defer to people from supposedly more advanced societies, but the syndrome persists.
This is most evident in the public sector, where British appointees, in particular, are rife in both national and local government. It would be a rare that didn’t include at least one interview with a public official whose formative work experience was gained in a country 20,000 kilometres away – one with a culture quite dissimilar to our own, and becoming less like us with every passing year.
Brits tend to be naturally officious, gravitating to jobs that often involve administering rules and regulations. They come from a more rigid, rulebound society – one described last year by the British author Lee Child, who chooses to live in New York, as ‘‘very managed and precious, the epitome of a nanny state’’.
They also tend to carry a bit of nationalistic baggage from the days of empire, and with it a belief that British ways are naturally superior. This doesn’t always gel with our more casual, egalitarian culture.
No doubt many of them are competent administrators, but you have to wonder whether some bring attitudes, values and mindsets that don’t transfer easily to a New Zealand setting.
This probably matters less where matters of pure policy are involved – as at the Treasury, where former British public servant Gabriel Makhlouf runs the show – than in jobs that call for an intuitive understanding of New Zealand culture and the ways in which it is unique. Another risk with highlevel imported appointments is that they may have no emotional stake in New Zealand or long-term commitment. If they screw things up, they can simply walk away and start afresh somewhere else. The public sector doesn’t have a happy record with overseas appointees. Remember the unfortunate Englishwoman Lesley Longstone, who lasted only 15 months as secretary of education? A Massey University academic euphemistically commented at the time she was possibly not well-equipped to read the New Zealand mood.
Another Englishman, Michael Houlihan, brought big ideas with him when he took over as chief executive of Te Papa, but his disastrous four-year tenure resulted in massive financial losses and a lot of unhappy staff. It remains to be seen whether the man now in charge, a Welshman, has a better handle on what it takes to run a New Zealand museum.
Then there was the embarrassing case of Stephen Wilce, a senior defence official recruited from Britain, whose CV turned out to be largely a work of fiction.
Questions might even be asked about the wisdom of putting an Irishwoman, Grainne Moss, in charge of Oranga Tamariki, the Ministry for Children.
She’s obviously capable and committed – she swam the English Channel at the age of 17 – but her