Waikato Times

Hurts city council’s brand

- Andrew Bydder Hamilton Ratepayers & Residents Associatio­n Magazine Forbes Andrew Bydder is a spokesman for the Hamilton Residents & Ratepayers Associatio­n and a local architect.

What is the most valuable brand in the world? The answer depends on who you ask. places Apple at No 1 (US$183 billion), ahead of Google. But the specialist consultanc­y Brand Finance puts Amazon (US$150b) on top of the heap, valuing Apple at a mere US$146b.

This is because a brand name is hard to value. It is an estimate of trust, goodwill, customer loyalty, reliabilit­y and other factors.

In the case of Apple, customers pay a substantia­l premium to own the latest gadget because they think Apple is best. Amazon is very different, with a reputation for great value. People happily shop online without checking out bricks-and-mortar stores.

So despite being hard to assess, brand value is hugely important to many companies. Building brand value is hard, takes time and can cost a lot of money. However, losing brand value can happen very easily, very quickly, and cost even more money.

Fonterra’s botulism scare hurt the company even though it turned out to be a false alarm. Tiger Woods’ advertisin­g appeal took a hammering when his sexual liaisons were exposed. Ford’s reputation for reliabilit­y was

1. The Blond Ambition World Tour of 1990, described by Rolling Stone magazine as a ‘‘sexually provocativ­e extravagan­za’’, featured what singer?

2. The porbeagle is a species of what?

3. A person who is insensitiv­e to the subtleties of what is being said is described as damaged in the 1970s when its Pinto model kept bursting into flames. It was revealed the company knew about the defect but estimated the cost of fixing it was more expensive than paying out for the resulting deaths.

What is the brand value of Hamilton City Council?

I am not going to try to put a figure on it, but I can confidentl­y say the value has fallen in the last decade. One reason for this is the Claudeland­s Events Centre.

The building cost $68.5 million and opened in 2011. According to the council-commission­ed 2009 business case, it was supposed to host 316 events in its first year and generate a $1.1m surplus. It sounded like a great investment.

But according to a $30,000 review initiated by Julie Hardaker when she was elected mayor, those figures were not accurate. To quote a news article of the time, ‘‘Hamilton City Council staff told the original author of the business case, Campbell Consulting, to increase the already optimistic number of events in the business plan by up to 50 per cent.’’

The review also found revenue projection­s were increased by up to 11 per cent and operating costs were reduced by up to 9 per cent. ‘‘Council staff had been unable to explain the variation.’’

Perhaps if councillor­s had been told the truth, the project may not have gone ahead. Is this the reason the numbers were adjusted?

Even that review was optimistic. It projected a $1.5m deficit, with losses continuing until at least 2015. Later having what sort of ear?

4. The TranzAlpin­e Express passes through what 8.5km tunnel?

5. What European territory was captured by Anglo-Dutch forces in

1704 and has remained under British control ever since?

6. Which breed of cow produces milk with a higher fat content – jerseys or friesians?

7. Which world leader is known by news reports have recorded a deficit of around $10m per year, which councillor Garry Mallett notes is over 7 per cent of our total rates take.

Cr Mallett wants to sell the centre for $1, a complete writedown of its now over $70m capital cost, as it has already required upgrades. This would be a great move to save us ongoing costs, except no buyers are coming forward – not surprising, given the terrible investment returns.

The decision to build Claudeland­s was flawed. With a massive expenditur­e programme scheduled for the next 10 years, what confidence do we have that the council’s commitment­s are based on trustworth­y informatio­n?

The level of faith the public has in council staff has nosedived as rates have gone up. If the council were a business, the damage to its brand value would be considered serious. But it is a monopoly protected by legislatio­n. We have no choice and no protection, as there appears to be no accountabi­lity for council’s mistakes.

Council may not need to care about brand value, but it should still care about the values that make up a brand. Trust, goodwill, integrity and accountabi­lity are still essential to the proper operation of any organisati­on, and council needs to start restoring these values.

The Hamilton Residents & Ratepayers Associatio­n wants a council that we can all respect.

❚ the nickname Mutti?

8. What is the English name of the dish known in French as puree de pommes de terre?

9. What No 1 hit song of 1977 by Paul McCartney featured bagpipes?

10. The 2002 film The Magdalene Sisters, which told the story of teenage girls working in a convent laundry, was set in what country?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand