Waikato Times

China’s mysterious Belt and Road

- Belt and road initiative: A strategic pathway,

If you’ve hosted any visitors from China lately, you may have felt like they were talking a mysterious new language. Conversati­ons with Chinese guests have been increasing­ly peppered with the phrase the ‘‘belt and road initiative’’, often shortened to BRI.

The belt and road initiative has been around since 2013. But it’s still not getting much traction as a concept here in New Zealand.

We know this because the Asia New Zealand Foundation added a question about the belt and road to the latest instalment of our Perception­s of Asia tracking survey.

Only 15 per cent of New Zealanders knew vaguely anything about it.

In a way, that’s to be expected, because the belt and road defies definition. But much as we might prefer just to tune out, we shouldn’t.

The belt and road is the framework off which China is hanging its engagement with the world. I’ve previously described it as China’s moon-shot.

Another way to describe it is as an ambitious way of connecting China to its neighbouri­ng countries and beyond. It applies to all levels of engagement with China, not just business.

In May last year, New Zealand became one of the ‘‘first Western countries’’ to sign a Memorandum of Arrangemen­t to strengthen cooperatio­n on BRI. A joint action plan is due to be finalised this year.

There’s growing interest in what this might look like. But we’re not hearing much of particular relevance yet from Chinese experts. New Zealand doesn’t fit the usual mould of China’s BRI partners, who tend to be developing economies closer to home.

Instead, we are hearing more honesty from China about the domestic drivers for the BRI, maintainin­g economic growth and addressing excess capacity in the Chinese economy – and maintainin­g political stability. It’s clear it is still an evolving concept.

While some countries have embraced the belt and road, for others it’s more contentiou­s. Malaysia’s prime minister has said he would like to scrap alreadysus­pended infrastruc­ture projects initiated by the previous government.

Meanwhile, Australia, Japan and the United States have formed a partnershi­p to invest in infrastruc­ture projects in the indo-Pacific. And there are grumblings in the Pacific, most recently from the Tongan prime minister, about the ability to meet debt repayments from China’s concession­al loans.

It’s important, then, to have an informed conversati­on about the opportunit­ies and challenges the initiative presents New Zealand. In recent months, we’ve seen the publicatio­n of a couple of useful home-grown reports. The most recent was published by the New Zealand Contempora­ry China Research Centre.

The earlier report,

was prepared by PwC for the New Zealand China Council, and sets some suggested areas for cooperatio­n.

Kiwis tend to like clarity – if there’s not a checklist of what the belt and road means, it’s easy to think that it’s not well thought-out and therefore we can just ignore it.

But the belt and road will never be clear. It’s deliberate­ly vague. And yet it’s very consequent­ial for New Zealand’s relationsh­ip with China.

For our part, the Asia New Zealand Foundation is leading a team of trade policy experts to Beijing and Shanghai next month.

Both China and New Zealand say they want trade liberalisa­tion, but it’s quite a challengin­g time to make progress with that. It will be good to get a better understand­ing of our respective priorities and where we may be talking at crosspurpo­ses.

While BRI is not a trade agreement, Chinese experts generally describe it in the context of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s wider promotion of globalisat­ion and trade liberalisa­tion. But it is what you would call a bilateral huband-spoke initiative (China is the hub. New Zealand a mere spoke). This jars a bit for New Zealand as a country that has benefited from regional and multilater­al trade agreements in which we are all equal spokes.

There’s no doubt the belt and road will continue to come up in New Zealand’s interactio­ns with China for the foreseeabl­e future, including at the opening of the new embassy in Beijing.

Once again, it comes back to that old adage, knowing your customer. With China as New Zealand’s largest trading partner, we can’t ignore the belt and road. Even if you don’t totally understand what it is yet, it is clear that it’s important to China and will therefore be important to business.

 ?? AP ?? The Golden Bridge on Silk Road installati­on outside the Belt and Road Forum in Beijing last year. Belt and road applies to all levels of engagement with China, not just business.
AP The Golden Bridge on Silk Road installati­on outside the Belt and Road Forum in Beijing last year. Belt and road applies to all levels of engagement with China, not just business.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand