Waikato Times

Children sway appeal to stay

- Danielle Clent

A Chinese couple with four children have avoided deportatio­n on humanitari­an grounds despite lying to Immigratio­n NZ.

In an Immigratio­n and Protection Tribunal decision made in March, it was decided the ‘‘exceptiona­l humanitari­an circumstan­ces’’ of the children trumped their parents’ ‘‘fraudulent attempts’’ to obtain residence.

It comes after a decision in February 2016 granted the family a temporary visa so their daughter could finish secondary school and prepare for their return to China. Millionair­es Jinqing Hu and wife Guifeng Li arrived in April 2003 with their now 19-yearold daughter, the decision said.

A month later, Hu and Li told Immigratio­n NZ their marriage had broken down and they had both entered into new relationsh­ips with New Zealand citizens.

Because of these relationsh­ips, they both obtained work visas and lodged residence applicatio­ns. But both Hu and Li withdrew their applicatio­ns for residence in January 2007, admitting that the divorce and new marriages were ‘‘contrived’’ in order to become residents, the decision said.

The couple’s attempts for a judicial review of their temporary visa and to have their case heard at the Court of Appeal were declined. The couple lodged an appeal on humanitari­an grounds in August 2017.

Their counsel said it was not in their children’s best interest to be deported, the decision said.

‘‘As a result of deportatio­n, their right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health, to an adequate standard of living and their right to education would be violated,’’ counsel said. ‘‘The children will face the utmost difficulty integratin­g into the Chinese educationa­l system as they are all illiterate in Mandarin. All four children of the family are high achievers, they hold aspiration­s for their future in New Zealand and, if deported, these aspiration­s would have to be abandoned.’’

The tribunal rejected the couple’s claims of facing poverty in China. ‘‘Counsel’s submission­s as to the family’s impoverish­ment in China are made in the face of the couple owning eight rental properties in Auckland,’’ the decision said.

In March 2016, the couple valued their assets at a net value of more than $3.5 million, something the tribunal said was likely to have increased.

The decision said the tribunal found the family was liable for deportatio­n because they were unlawfully in New Zealand.

‘‘This has been brought about, ultimately by Mr Hu and Ms Li’s dishonest representa­tions to Immigratio­n NZ.’’

In response to a letter from the tribunal, Hu and Li said they came to New Zealand in 2003 to escape the Sars virus epidemic.

They said an immigratio­n consultant, who they paid ‘‘a large sum of money’’, said that a marriage of convenienc­e was the only way to obtain residence, the decision said. In the end, the tribunal said it was in the children’s best interest to stay in New Zealand and allowed the parents to stay too, based on exceptiona­l circumstan­ces of a humanitari­an nature.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand