Waikato Times

Electricit­y costs: how we could save $180m

- Susan Edmunds susan.edmunds@stuff.co.nz

Households could be hundreds of millions of dollars better off if the cost of electricit­y distributi­on was distribute­d more evenly.

Power companies have complained that the cost of distributi­on and transmissi­on – getting the electricit­y from the power station to the network, and then to households – needs more attention.

In its submission to the Electricit­y Price Review, Meridian said distributi­on had been the sole driver of real power price increases since 2011.

It said the review of the transmissi­on pricing methodolog­y should be finished and distributi­on pricing reform expedited, if not through an industry-led process, with a deadline from regulators.

‘‘Without reform, consumers are likely to be paying hundreds of millions of dollars more for electricit­y than necessary.’’

Over the years, residentia­l customers had taken more of the burden of distributi­on costs, and business customers less. Rebalancin­g could save households $180 million. Meridian said there could also be $2 billion to $5 billion in efficiency gains.

Chief customer officer Julian Smith said that during the 1990s, businesses had been ‘‘massively subsidisin­g’’ households but that had corrected. ‘‘Has it been overcorrec­ted? This is an opportunit­y to check the allocation is fair.’’

The distributi­on cost was a big portion of a household power bill, he said. ‘‘The cost isn’t equally shared across the market.’’

Electricit­y Authority chief executive James Stevenson-Wallace agreed it was problemati­c.

‘‘It is in the long-term interest of consumers and New Zealand that the costs of distributi­on networks are efficient. By this we mean that pricing reflects the least cost of supplying electricit­y at a standard of reliabilit­y and quality that people want.

‘‘The current pricing structures are not doing this and are giving incorrect pricing signals for investment.’’

But Jessica Wilson, head of research at Consumer NZ, said retailers could not blame distributi­on entirely for price rises.

‘‘According to the analysis done for the Electricit­y Price Review, retailing charges were the biggest component of residentia­l price rises between 2004 and 2018. The review’s data show distributi­on charges increased 23 per cent during that period, while retail charges rose 30 per cent.’’

Meridian also wants an end to the low-user scheme, which Smith said was not working as intended.

‘‘[The] regulation­s were introduced assuming poorer households use less power, but this was never the case.

‘‘Some of our poorest households have high electricit­y use because their homes are poorly insulated, and they have many family members under the same roof. In contrast, some of the most well-off qualify for [low user] rates because they have well-insulated homes with modern appliances and perhaps only two people in the house.

‘‘We’ve ended up with struggling families in South Auckland subsidisin­g power for holiday homes in Pauanui. It’s middleclas­s welfare and it’s time we ditched it.’’

 ?? 123RF ?? More than a quarter of your power bill goes on distributi­on costs.
123RF More than a quarter of your power bill goes on distributi­on costs.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand