Waikato Times

Beguiling and bloated Elvis fails to convince

-

Elvis (M, 159 mins) Directed by Baz Luhrmann Reviewed by Graeme Tuckett ★★★1⁄2

Iguess the outline of the story of Elvis Aaron Presley and the relationsh­ip he had with his manager ‘‘Colonel’’ Tom Parker, is pretty well known by anyone with even a cursory interest in The King.

Parker wasn’t a colonel. In fact, he wasn’t even a Parker. He was Andreas Cornelis van Kuijk, an illegal immigrant to the United States who may have been wanted for questionin­g over the murder of a young woman in his home town in the Netherland­s.

As Parker, he was a carnival hustler, a conman and was prone to psychotic episodes. None of which hindered him, when he first saw the young Presley perform and witnessed the effect he had on a – predominan­tly female – audience.

The story of the promoter and his protege from that day on is complex, nettlesome and would quite probably take a documentar­y series to really excavate. In fact, the astonishin­g and rapturous HBO two-parter, Elvis Presley: The Searcher has already done this mahi – and having seen that film a few times now, I’m even more keenly aware of what Baz Luhrmann’s Elvis is missing.

In trying to compress all of Elvis’ adult life and several key scenes from his childhood into a feature film – even one as lengthy and bloated as this – Luhrmann must necessaril­y over-simplify and elide. So while Elvis absolutely nails the early years, with the adolescent Presley, raised in a dirt poor and mainly black part of town, falling for the heady magic of the Beale Street blues clubs, it also skips distractin­gly through that tragic last decade.

We know enough about the paranoid, neutered and sedated parody that Elvis became. And Luhrmann, if he wishes this to be any sort of definitive biopic, must end his film in those years.

But, the indignitie­s of Elvis’ last days do not make for a flourish, as the credits roll.

Whatever we loathe about the invention and contrivanc­e of Bohemian Rhapsody, we have to at least acknowledg­e that bringing the curtain down on Freddie Mercury’s life with Queen’s triumph at Live Aid made for a show-stopping finale.

But Elvis doesn’t have a gift like that for Luhrmann – and so it was that I spent the last 40 minutes of Elvis, distracted­ly wishing that Luhrmann had just said ‘‘the hell with the truth’’, and ended his film as the last notes of Elvis’ 1968 Comeback Special – magnificen­tly recreated – were still ringing around the theatre.

Luhrmann’s Elvis is, in many ways, a great entertainm­ent and a good night out. Luhrmann is a showman and stylist with few equals and the intricacy and dazzle that he brings to the constructi­on of the first third of this film is worth your ticket.

As are Austin Butler and Tom Hanks. Butler as Elvis is phenomenal, and Hanks, under a kilo of prosthetic­s, still convinces and appals as Parker.

But I walked out feeling that the bothersome realities of real life had been too much to overcome.

Elvis is a flashy sideshow attraction, maybe even a themepark ride, based on the life of an unrepeatab­le figure. But it is not a credible biopic.

Elvis is now screening in cinemas nationwide.

 ?? ?? Austin Butler plays Elvis in Baz Luhrmann’s latest extravagan­za.
Austin Butler plays Elvis in Baz Luhrmann’s latest extravagan­za.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand