Populist leaders seize opportunity to crack down on human rights
Soldiers patrol the streets with their fingers on machine-gun triggers.
The army guards an exhibition centre-turned-makeshift-hospital crowded with rows of bunks for those infected with the coronavirus.
And Serbia’s president warns residents that Belgrade graveyards won’t be big enough to bury the dead if people ignore his government’s lockdown orders.
Since President Aleksandar Vucic announced an open-ended state of emergency on March 15, parliament has been sidelined, borders shut, a 12-hour police-enforced curfew imposed and people over 65 banned from leaving their homes — some of Europe’s strictest measures to combat the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Serbian leader, who makes dramatic daily appearances issuing new decrees, has assumed full power, prompting an outcry from opponents who say he has seized control of the state in an unconstitutional manner.
Rodoljub Sabic, a lawyer and former state commissioner for personal data protection, says that by proclaiming a state of emergency, Vucic has assumed “full supremacy” over decision-making during the crisis, although his constitutional role is only a ceremonial one.
“He issues orders which are automatically accepted by the government,” Sabic said. “No checks and balances.”
In ex-communist Eastern Europe and elsewhere, populist leaders are introducing harsh measures including uncontrolled cellphone surveillance of their citizens and lengthy jail sentences for those who flout lockdown decrees or spread false information.
The human-rights chief of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe said he understood the need to act swiftly to protect populations from the Covid-19 pandemic, but newly declared states of emergency must include a time limit and parliamentary oversight.
“A state of emergency — wherever it is declared and for whatever reason — must be proportionate to its aim, and only remain in place for as long as absolutely necessary,” the OSCE rights chief, Ingibjrg Slrn Gsladttir, said in a statement.
In times of national emergency, countries often take steps that rights activists see as curtailing civil liberties, such as increased surveillance, curfews and restrictions on travel, or limiting freedom of expression. China locked down whole cities this year to stop the spread of the virus, as India did with the whole nation.
Amnesty International researcher Massimo Moratti said states of emergency were allowed under international human-rights law, but warned that the restrictive measures should not become a “new normal”.
“Such states need to last only while the danger lasts,” he told The Associated Press.
In Hungary, parliament this week passed a law giving Prime Minister Viktor Orbn’s government the right to rule by decree for as long as a state of emergency declared on March 11 was in effect.
The law also amends the criminal code to include two new crimes.
It sets prison terms of up to five years for those convicted of spreading false information about the pandemic and up to eight years for those interfering with efforts to contain the spread of the coronavirus, like a curfew or mandatory quarantine.
Rights groups say the law creates the possibility of an indefinite and uncontrolled state of emergency and gives Orbn and his government carte blanche to restrict human rights.
“This is not the way to address the very real crisis that has been caused by the Covid-19 pandemic,” said David Vig, Amnesty International’s
Hungary director.
Hungarian Justice Minister Judit Varga said criticisms of Hungary’s bill were “political attacks based on the wrong interpretation or intentional distortion” of its contents.
Elsewhere, governments have also adopted extreme measures.
In Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu’s caretaker government passed a series of emergency executive measures to try to quell the spread of the new virus.
These include authorising unprecedented electronic surveillance of Israeli citizens and a slowdown of court activity that forced the postponement of Netanyahu’s own pending criminal trial on serious corruption charges.
In Russia, authorities have turned up the pressure on media outlets and social-media users in an effort to control the narrative amid the growing coronavirus outbreak in that country, where the capital, Moscow, went on lockdown Monday and many other regions quickly followed suit.
Under the guise of weeding out coronavirus-related “fake news”, law enforcement has cracked down on people sharing opinions on social media, and on news outlets that criticise the government’s response to the outbreak.
In Poland, people are worried about a new government smartphone application introduced for people in home quarantine.
Panoptykon Foundation, a human-rights group that opposes surveillance, says it has received a number of queries from users who support government efforts to fight the pandemic but worry that by using the app they could be giving too much private data to the government.
Panoptykon notes that people have been receiving home visits from police even though the app asks them to send photos of themselves at home. This double control is “disproportionate”, it says.
While nearly 1200 coronavirus cases and 31 deaths have been recorded in Serbia, according to Johns Hopkins University, testing has been extremely limited and experts believe the figures greatly under-represent the real number of victims. Most people suffer mild or moderate symptoms, such as fever and cough, but for some, especially older adults and people with existing health problems, more severe illness can occur, including pneumonia and death.
Images of the transformation of a huge communist-era exhibition hall in Belgrade into a makeshift hospital for coronavirus-infected patients has triggered widespread public fear of the detention camp-looking facility filled with row upon row of 3000 metal beds.
The Serbian president said he was glad that people got scared, adding he would have chosen even a worselooking spot for the makeshift hospital if that would stop Serbs from flouting his stay-at-home orders.
“Someone has to spend 14 to 28 days there,” Vucic said. “If it’s not comfortable, I don’t care. We are fighting for people’s lives.
“If someone thinks they will apply makeup or brush their teeth four times a day, well they won’t. They’ll do it once a day.”
Do not Drown Belgrade, a group of civic activists, has launched an online petition against what they call Vucic’s abuse of power and curtailing of basic human rights.
It says his frequent public appearances create panic in an already worried society.
“We do not need Vucic’s daily dramatisation, but the truth: Concrete data and instructions from experts,” the petition says.