Weekend Herald

Good to set out financial expectatio­ns early

- Jeremy Sutton The Ex-Files

It would also be important whether they have been introduced to each other’s families and there has been some financial closeness.

Q: My daughter wants to buy an electric vehicle (EV) to obtain the government subsidy. But she cannot afford to do this without family support. I am also keen to buy her a new jetski for her 21st birthday. Finally, I want to give her original art pieces. She has had a partner for more than 18 months, but the other person was at university in another city. Since lockdown they have moved in together and it has got serious. They haven’t lived in the same city for more than six months. What can I do to protect her, and the family, should she split up with her partner?

A: The law makes a presumptio­n that any partner is entitled to share equally in the family home, family chattels in any other relationsh­ip property after a period of three years.

If you were to financiall­y provide for her in buying the EV, that would become relationsh­ip property after she had been in a relationsh­ip for three years.

De facto factors

First, you need to consider when the de facto relationsh­ip has begun. There is guidance from the Property (Relationsh­ips) Act 1976 as to relevant factors that are to be included.

It lists factors which may be relevant, but there could be other matters of importance not included.

The Family Court can decide to take equal weight or more for some factors. Normally, the court will be looking at whether there has been commitment and permanency between them. Have they undertaken mutual holidays with their families?

My experience has been that the court will normally look at some factors as having disproport­ionate weight. Because your daughter and her partner have lived together for only six months, that will not mean that the relationsh­ip will only be for that period.

It can be hard to determine when a de facto relationsh­ip has begun (and moved on from dating) in these circumstan­ces.

They could be found to be in a de facto relationsh­ip when living in different cities during the lockdown.

It would also be important whether they have been introduced to each other’s families and there has been some financial closeness. The extent of communicat­ion including phone calls, text messaging, gifts and emails would also be considered.

Family chattels

Most vehicles depreciate over time and are perhaps less likely to need to be protected. Cars are often bought and sold over a lifetime and therefore it is hard to protect against all future vehicles for the EV purchase.

The jetski is another item that will depreciate over time. Personally, I would rather not try to protect the family here.

The jetski is a depreciabl­e asset that could be sold easily.

It is normally considered a family chattel that will not be valued highly in any relationsh­ip property split. The value of a chattel for relationsh­ip property purposes is normally the market value at separation and not the usually higher insurance value.

However, if you were to help your child in the purchase of a house in the future, real property does not tend to appreciate and therefore in that case I would suggest a loan agreement or some other financial document to protect you and the family.

The pieces of art

This is a distinct category from the EV and the jetski. Art often does increase in value over time and is not sold for the duration of the relationsh­ip. My experience is that the value and ownership of artwork can be contentiou­s at the end of a relationsh­ip.

You could consider asking your daughter to either execute a contractin­g out or prenuptial agreement with her partner or you could loan the painting to them while retaining ownership.

Legal documents

I favour formal documentat­ion being drawn up by a family lawyer to acknowledg­e that the art continues to be owned by you both.

Your daughter’s partner is more likely to be sympatheti­c to you wanting to keep the art in your family.

There could be some other financial arrangemen­t your lawyer could recommend.

Best of luck to you.

Summary

It is good you are wanting to help your daughter out. It is best for your daughter to start early to establish financial expectatio­ns in the relationsh­ip, particular­ly in respect of those items that come from your family.

Jeremy Sutton is a senior family lawyer. He specialise­s in divorce cases where there are significan­t assets, including family trust and complex business structures.

 ?? ?? The jetski would normally be considered a family chattel that would not be valued highly in any relationsh­ip property split.
The jetski would normally be considered a family chattel that would not be valued highly in any relationsh­ip property split.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand