The trials of ‘Apostle’ Tamaki
On the face of it, the actions of self-styled Apostle Brian Tamaki appear little more than attention-seeking for the edification of his followers in the Destiny Church.
As with most such cases, however, the truth is probably both more complex, and banal.
The 63-year-old had already been charged three times over his attendance at Auckland Domain lockdown protests. The rallies were held to protest against rules such as vaccine mandates and lockdowns, which are meant to stop or control the spread of Covid-19. Monday morning’s arrest is thought to be in relation to Tamaki’s attendance at a rally in Christchurch earlier in January. Tamaki has denied all charges including the claim that he has breached his bail conditions.
Tamaki has consistently talked up his resistance to government orders while exhorting his supporters to follow suit. Given the attention on himself, he has little choice but to hold his futile and, ultimately for himself, frustrating course. Phone cameras follow Tamaki everywhere, even to his family home, and the footage is posted to social media — more often than not by his fawning followers. When invited to speak at rallies, Tamaki is unable to subordinate his egotism enough to decline. To step back now would be hard to explain. Better to look a fool to an entire nation than to appear to waver.
Public health regulations are laid down to preserve life and protect the well-being of the entire population. People are entitled to object and even to protest but there are ways of making this sentiment known without breaking the regulations and endangering our most vulnerable.
Coincidentally, Tamaki has repeatedly criticised the Government for not funding him to deliver his “Man Up” programme in prisons, even though he hadn’t lodged a formal application as part of the Corrections tender process. He claims to have had success with his 15-week programme to help “dysfunctional” men caught in the cycle of release and arrest. He said the denial of access would lead to “inmate revolts in evey [sic] prison”.
While the unrest is yet to manifest, now might be a good time for Tamaki to walk the talk of the programme. He has cast himself as the persecuted man of principle. He has set himself on a path no longer of his choosing, but one where the justice system decides. He has painted himself into a corner, a remand cell.
Apparently without guile, his family have claimed he is New Zealand’s first political prisoner. No, he is not. It is not the Government, the Ministry of Health, the police, the courts, nor the judge who has done this. It is wholly on himself.
For once, it behoves Tamaki’s followers to learn from his example.