Whanganui Chronicle

Change is hard but we’re making progress in parity

Real change must come through understand­ing and forgivenes­s, not fear and anger

- Rob Rattenbury

AOf course the main tactic emerging so far from NatAct is to create the fear in enough people of New Zealand being changed forever if Labour is returned to drive a huge number right on election day.

nother Budget has come and gone, the latest from finance minister Grant Robertson outlining a pretty tame plan for the coming months. The highlight for me was the $5 fee on prescripti­ons being abolished. Small stuff to some but really important to many.

It can mean the difference between people getting well or getting sicker if they cannot find that money for their medication­s.

Watching the reaction to the Budget from Christophe­r Luxon and David Seymour was saddening. Both were hugely negative about New Zealand.

To be fair to Act, Seymour trotted out Act’s alternativ­e budget like a spieler at the carnival. Flashy pretty colours, handy little book. At least he had a plan.

Of course the main tactic emerging so far from NatAct is to create the fear in enough people of New Zealand being changed forever if Labour is returned to drive a huge number right on election day.

Is that fear reasonable? 183 years after the Treaty was signed and about 170 years since it was consigned by the government of the day to the back of a documents safe somewhere in Auckland, it’s still being remembered.

It’s a simply worded treaty, in both Mā ori and English. All historians I have read consider, despite its simplicity, it means one thing to many Mā ori and another to the Crown. There’s the rub.

The Crown decided in the 1850s that the Treaty was a barrier to settlement so put it to one side. History tells us the result. By then Pākehā were flooding into New Zealand.

Mā ori never really forgot the Treaty. They certainly didn’t forget being called rebels on their own land, land-theft and confiscati­on as war reparation after defending their whenua and the gerrymande­ring that took place with the active assistance of the insultingl­y termed early Mā ori Land Court.

So 183 years later here we are. Still sorting it all out. Mā ori found a voice in the 1970s via groups like Nga Tamatoa and are becoming more insistent on equity as time goes by.

The NatActs all know this. They are currying the fear in people that NZ society will disintegra­te as we know it if Labour returns.

Is it actually time for New Zealand to confront the wrong parts of colonisati­on? Of course NatAct know that but are quite happy to kick things on down the road to another time, focused on short-term power gain.

Te Pā ti Mā ori leader Rawiri

Waititi talking firmly to an almost empty parliament­ary chamber provided the contrast. He spoke in English throughout and outlined TPM policy. Much of it perhaps uncomforta­ble to listen to. He is the voice for activist Mā ori.

For the sake of social cohesion real change must come. It must never come through fear and anger but through concession­s, understand­ing and forgivenes­s. Mā ori want equity, that’s all.

I would pose this. National is using the emotive term “Coalition of Chaos” to describe Labour et al. What will New Zealand be like in three years if NatActNZF are in charge?

Three Waters put in the too-hard basket, tax breaks for the wealthy, ending the Mā ori Health Authority? All stuff not denied by NatAct.

Change is hard for many, especially many older folk. We pine for simpler times. But we also forget how far we have come in our lifetimes in creating a more open and fairer society than our parents knew. Our children don’t share all our vision of the world even if they say they do. Did we share our parents’ vision, no, not at all? That’s progress.

 ?? ?? Now is not the time to stop the progress we’ve made as a country, writes Rob Rattenbury
Now is not the time to stop the progress we’ve made as a country, writes Rob Rattenbury
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand